Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Nostradumbass
Det fanns en "godhetsavsikt" 1975 när Palme sa att vi ska ta emot allt avskräde, men i hans värld fanns avståndet som en gräns. Alla kunde inte ta sig hit. Man kan alltid flyga hit lite "high profile"-flyktingar från Vietnam. (Eller Ecuadors Londonambassad, anybody?) Så kunde Palme lova allt till alla. Sen hände Soros. Soros har dödat svensk socialdemokrati. Det gick inte första gången 1992 ... det blev bara 500% ränta då. Med massinvandring gick det....
En bortkollrad identitetspolitisk icke-nationalistisk socialdemokrati. Grattis Soros. "Grattis" Löfvén.
Och här är en del av förklaringen till varför det multikulturella lyckoriket inte riktigt vill infinna sig. Virginia Hall i Breitbart:
Citat:
Professor Afshin Ellian has warned that bleats of “multiculturalism” are a one-way street as Muslims in Europe oppress historic minorities in their own lands and have no intention of showing “tolerance”.
The Iranian-born professor of law argues that while Muslim migrants are quick to claim their customs under “multiculturalism”, they have no intention of reciprocating.
Writing in Elsevier magazine, Dr. Ellian says Muslims rapidly learn the rules of multiculturalism and push for their place in society but have no intention of adopting any sort of progressive ideals.
“The Islamic world is not multicultural. New migrants in Europe rapidly learn the rules of multiculturalism — claim your place in society! Minorities do not take the progressive ideals, but the despotism of their country of origin as a starting point”, he stated in the Dutch weekly.
Citat:
Asserting that “the Islamic world is not multicultural”, the professor declares how, despite their sharp elbows as a minority in Europe, Muslims would be outraged at the idea of mass immigration of non-Muslims to their lands.
Dr. Ellian writes: “Globalisation in Islamic countries has not produced multicultural societies there. It is unthinkable in most Muslim countries that a significant number of Europeans would like to settle there.
“From Morocco to Pakistan or Iran: mass immigration of Europeans are excluded. In most Islamic countries non-Muslims, and especially Europeans, are not allowed to own land, homes, or businesses. So multicultural advocates have never looked at the world,” the professor contends.
Citat:
Dr. Ellian suggests that the speed at which migrants from monocultural countries learn to exploit Western multiculturalism is “almost unbelievable”, and slams the left for creating and nurturing the ideology.
As a result of this, he said migrants from the Middle East have begun to hold left wing parties “hostage”, lamenting that, in the Netherlands, local Labour party branches are in minority hands — “a true multicultural mafia”, as he puts it.
Despite their joining of, and commandeering of, left wing parties, the professor warns Muslims involved in European politics tend to be anything but progressive.
Mass Muslim migration combined with multiculturalism, will lead to an era of “multicultural backwardness”, Dr. Ellian warned.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016...ticulturalism/
Ja nog känner vi igen fenomenet och strategin? Islamisera mera. Demokratisnack - nej tack.
Och snart kommer vi inte ha något annat val än att anpassa oss till en islamiserad tillvaro, demografin gör jobbet, religionsfrihet och det demokratiska valsystemet är portarna. Leon Hadar beskriver, med hjälp av beteendemönstret hos ultrakonservativa judar, hur det går till. Artikeln som först publicerades i American Conservative är lång och mycket läsvärd.
Hadar tar avstamp i en facebookdebatt angående en fransk halal-supermarket. Äldre franska invånare klagade över att de inte längre kunde handla de varor de önskade varpå någon myndighet ålade halalisterna att även saluföra traditionella franska varor. Diskussionen gick fram och tillbaka till dess Hadar kastade in frågan om det skulle vara ok att tvinga kosherhandlare att sälja fläsk. Då gick även de mest sekulära judiska debattörerna i taket. Det är så multikultur funkar, gärna multikultur så att just min kulturkrets får ta plats och bli representerad, men ingen multikultur som hotar att utblanda just min särskilt superviktiga kulturkrets. Hadar driver resonemanget vidare, på vilken grund ska vi kunna förbjuda muslimskt månggifte när vi erkänner samkönade äktenskap, eller kvinnlig omskärelse när det är en kulturell/religiös sedvänja som praktiserats bara i år på över 200 miljoner flickor i 27 länder?
Citat:
To put it simply, when it comes to freedom of religion and figuring out the exact boundaries between religion and state, numbers count. And as more Muslims settle in the West, and gain citizenship and the right of vote, the contours of the debate over religion and its place in society are bound to change.
We like to imagine that debates over core political issues are conducted by great philosophers who are committed to our sacred values. But in liberal democratic societies, the principle of one-man-one-vote carries a lot of influence in terms of how we define morality or, for that matter, what we recognise as a “legitimate” religious belief.
Citat:
Members of a religion whose adherents don’t subscribe to the notion of religious freedom, who believe that religion and state cannot be separated, are beginning to challenge what we regard as the basic axioms of the Enlightenment. They are doing that by using their growing political power, and they are quite confident that they have the upper hand in the birth-rate battles that are transforming demographics worldwide.
Citat:
According to the common liberal fantasy, the multicultural nature of Western societies allows these Muslims to have their cake and eat it too, to maintain their religious identity while integrating into the general population and becoming French or German or Swedish “like us.” Soon enough, the hijab-wearing woman will look like any other sexually liberated French woman.
In reality, Muslim immigrants take advantage of multiculturalism to maintain their religious identity while resisting pressure to assimilate into French society. Parisians hope that the Muslims congregating in their neighborhoods will eventually leave their ghettos, like Jews did after being granted civil rights following the French Revolution. A few halal stores might remain, but the majority of Muslims will shop in the general supermarket.
Most Muslims are not following this liberal game plan. With their growing population, they are spreading into new parts of the cities. They will become the majority in more and more neighborhoods in Paris, where new mosques will be built and where more women will be wearing hijabs. And one day, the only option for France’s aging Christian population will be to shop at the local halal supermarket.
If you think this is a farfetched nightmare scenario concocted by an Islamophobic mind, consider the way that members of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community or Haredi in Israel have been winning the demographic wars, strengthening their political power, and gradually transforming their secular country.
http://swarajyamag.com/world/why-eur...sm-is-a-mirage
Och så beskrivs då hur de ultraortodoxa judarna blivit en maktfaktor i Israel genom att hårdnackat hålla fast vid sina särrättigheter och subventioner och genom att alltjämt ha familjer med mellan fem och tio barn som samtliga fostras till att vägra anpassning.
