Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
perruches
Jag har skrivit en text som jag ar osaker pa om det later korrekt, speciellt nar jag sager omedvetet, socialbidrag samt fim persons.
Snalla ngn snall sjal ratta garna mina fel. Tack pa forhand
''I forgot to add the last person: In Sweden it’s important to be correct when it comes to politics, even in our every day life. When I mean correct regarding politics, I based that on the environment you live in. There is a family that lives in a neighborhood ‘’meant’’, for people with low revenues. Many of the neighbors go on social assistances. But this family does not agree with the opinion about the politics of their neighbors. And therefore they get isolated.
The end of the movie will be that all the film persons will have a meeting –still without knowing each other. And they will unconsciously question each other. For example the couple that is childless will question the man with the small sex (that now has a girlfriend) why they do not have children. And the only once that are happy are the Narcissist and the girl with Dawn Syndrome and they do not question anyone. ''
Första meningen är svår att förstå utan sammanhang. Om det gäller personer i en film är det bästa ordet kanske "characters", isynnerhet om det inte är en dokumentär.
- Ordet "revenues" låter malplacerat, varför inte bara "income"?
- "being on welfare" är nog det vanligaste uttrycket för socialbidrag
- "small sex", betyder vad?
- "only once" skall vara "only ones"
- Det heter Down's Syndrome.
- "unconsciously question" - vad menas?
- Och har de verkligen ett möte, ett sammanträde, eller träffas de bara annars?
