Boken heter Wagner, Richard E., Fiscal Sociology and the Theory of Public Finance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007.
Och jag ska då efter besvara frågan: How would tax incentives influence the connections between the public and market squares, and the taxpayer-political enterprise relations?
Men jag fattar inte riktigt frågan
Detta är vad han skrev i boken;
Citat:
Chapter 2 contained phenomena that are interested in a theory of public fiance derived from the bivalent nature of human nature, in which people seek both autonomy and society. Where both fiscal and market phenomena originate from one and the same source: that economic individuals pursue plans to reach more desirable states to be. The market and the state are both emerging phenomena that come from human effort to pursue plans within a social interaction.
A society contains a confirmation of companies, some established through the square *. The historical record contains examples where the configurations have been relatively static. It is actually possible to imagine a completely static configuration that simply reproduces itself. A society that conforms to this configuration would be a static, caste-based society. The pattern of the relationship denoted by the cast must not be explicitly recognized and recognized by the members of society, but that society should have a caste-like character alike. A business executive whose husband is a doctor will be replaced by a daughter and son who later occupy the same positions. If the parents live in a house of 5000 square meters on a hill with a lovely view, their children will replace them to live the same way. A car mechanic and her husband, a waiter, will be replaced in these abilities by their children. If the parents live in a house of 1200 square meters without a view in noisy, dusty and congested parts of the city, then their children will come. Parents who associate with people in a country club environment will have children who form their associations in the same way. Parents who associate on the street corners will have children who associate in the same way. Such a static society would be described as one in which people accept their place and position within society as that is just the way it is.
According to Wagner, "government" refers to a set of spaces where social interactions continue and develop. Tax activities should be associated less with state intervention in the economy than with arenas for cooperation and conflicts. Wagner emphasizes the importance of emerging development processes driven by human-to-their-conflict conflicts. Wagner paints the image of a "two-forum social architecture" (Chapter 2) where the state and the market interpenetrate each other.
The market and tax phenomena are similar to their origins in human nature. Where these claims add and how well they square with Austrian economy and libertarianism. Wagner distinguishes between private property and public property, or common. He takes a narrow picture of private property, one that only affects the sphere where the person is truly independent. As such, it cannot be inclusive in any society.
Maybe this summary is a help.
Vad betyder ens frågan? ;$