9/11 - WTC/Pentagon/Shanksville m.m - Tråd Nr 2

QUOTE=ElGiganten]Till skillnad från dig och andra foliehattar så tittar jag på mer än youtube för att bilda mig en uppfattning.
Jag har tex läst det mesta då det gäller officiella rapporter, du vet väl att det finns flera? Inte, nej just det du hade ju bara sett en film om 9/11 kommissionen. Då förstår jag ditt något snäva tänkande (om det nu finns något tänkande).

Att vara så in i helvete trångsynt att man ens har mage och skriva detta skit visar bara på hur "öppen" du är för detta.

Din beskrivning av händelsen finns inte beskrivet NÅGONSTANS av NÅGON myndighet eller i NÅGON rapport.
Du skriver detta för att du vill att det skall vara på detta viset.
Visst sitt och dröm om detta men tyvärr för din del blir det ALDRIG en sanning. VAKNAAAAAA!

Men trots att du alltså inte ens brytt dig om att läsa dem, och har visat att du inte vet vad de säger eller innehåller, så drad du dig inte för att inte bara avfärda dem utan också kategorisera dem som "trolltrick" Ja, det där med att ha ett öppet sinne är speciellt.

2. Why did NIST not consider a “controlled demolition” hypothesis with matching computer modeling and explanation as it did for the “pancake theory” hypothesis? A key critique of NIST’s work lies in the complete lack of analysis supporting a “progressive collapse” after the point of collapse initiation and the lack of consideration given to a controlled demolition hypothesis.

NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation into what caused the WTC towers to collapse, as explained in NIST’s dedicated Web site, http://wtc.nist.gov. This included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the collapses of the towers.

(...)

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

• he collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;
• the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST, or by the New York Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

(...)

In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to Sept. 11, 2001. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.