Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Vaxad
Det är ytterst ovanligt att det är som i Sverige på den punkten. Vi är i princip unika med att ge ut FUP till den misstänkte innan rättegång.
Det verkar som att försvaret har rätt till beviset enligt samma lag som lagstadgar rätten till advokat och översättare.
IANAL, men rättigheten verkar åtminstone finnas. Vittnen har rätt till bevisföringen enl art. 81.e. Försvaret måste aktivt efterfråga tillgång och får ta kopior och anteckningar enl art. 94.
Citat:
ART. 83
Rights of defendants
During the course of criminal proceedings, a defendant has the following rights: a) not to give any statements during criminal proceedings, and their attention shall be drawn to the fact that their refusal to make any statements shall not cause them to suffer any unfavorable consequences, and that any statement they
do make may be used as evidence against them;
1) to be informed of the act for which they are under investigation and the charges against them;
b) to consult the case file, under the law;
c) to have a retained counsel and, if they cannot afford one one, in cases of mandatory legal assistance the right to have a court-appointed counsel;
d) to propose production of evidence under the terms set by law, to raise objections and to argue in court;
e) to file any other applications related to the settlement of the criminal and civil part of the case;
f) to an interpreter free of charge, when they cannot understand, cannot express themselves properly or cannot communicate in the Romanian language;
g) to use a mediator, in cases permitted by law; to be informed of their rights;
h) other rights set by law.
Åklagaren är även skyldig att använda bevis som är i favör för tilltalade (art. 100.1).
Jag tror det är art. 92.7 som vi söker mer konkret. Andrew Tates advokat har tillgång till underlaget, intressant nog enligt exakt samma paragraf som används för att överklaga häktningsansökan. Så den lagen känner de till.
Citat:
(7) During the course of preliminary chamber procedure and of the trial, a counsel has the right to consult documents of the case file, to assist the defendant, to make use of the defendant’s procedure rights, to file complaints, applications, motions, exceptions and objections.
Samt art. 94:
Citat:
(1) Counsels of parties and of main subjects have the right to request consultation of the case file throughout the criminal proceedings. Such right may not be exercised or restricted abusively.
(2) Case file consultation implies the right to read its documents, the right to write down data or information from the case file, and the right to obtain photocopies, at the client’s expense.
https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/...REF(2018)043-e