Efterspelet av stormningen av Kapitolium för Trump och andra inblandade

It was all a setup.

Trump supporters were framed by FBI and government operatives and BLM and Antifa terrorists.

”A. The Sixth Amendment does not apply to congressional hearings

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

U.S. Const. amend. VI.

The Sixth Amendment right of a criminal defendant to cross-examine witnesses and call witnesses on his or her behalf has been held inapplicable to a congressional hearing.

Morton Rosenberg, When Congress Comes Calling: A Primer on the Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry 37 (2009) (footnote omitted).

… In a congressional hearing, a witness has no right to counsel, confrontation of
witnesses, or cross-examination. It has been suggested that this result is correct because such a witness should have no greater rights than a witness in a court of law. As a practical matter, however, witnesses are usually allowed to confer with counsel, inside and outside the committee room.

Comment, The Rights of a Witness Before a Congressional Committee, 29 Fordham L. Rev. 357, 368 (1960) (footnotes omitted).

B. Likewise, the “right to counsel” should not apply in state legislative hearings
His refusal to be further examined, or to remain in attendance, was placed upon the
ground that the committee refused to recognize his right to be attended by counsel and act under his advice in answering questions, but we are of opinion that he had no constitutional or legal right to the aid of counsel on such examination. The constitutional provision on the subject is that "in any trial in any court whatever the party accused shall be allowed to appear and defend in person and with counsel as in civil actions." This provision has been very liberally construed and held to apply to trials before any authority having jurisdiction to try…. But here the relator was not on trial, nor was he a
party, but he was a mere witness called upon to testify in relation to charges against another person, and there was no trial pending against any one. As well might a witness, examined before a grand jury conducting an investigation of a charge against another person, with a view to his indictment, claim the right to be attended by counsel. We do not think that a mere witness has that right.”