Vad som hade hänt om det var ett jobb från insidan är att en stor del av bevis materialet hade blivit förstört, vilket är precis vad som hände.
Band inspelade av flygledare på 911 blev förstörda.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F03EEDF173CF934A35756C0A9629C8B 63
http://web.archive.org/web/20040509021515/http://www.suntimes.com/output/terror/cst-nws-tape07.html
CIA video banden med intervjuerna av al-qaida medlemar som 911 kommissionen bygger sina "bevis" på blev förstörda.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/washington/06cnd-intel.html?_r=4&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1 196993135-HmfZyvV1r92x3FPDmp6hyg&oref=slogin&oref=login&oref =slogin
Stålet från byggnanderna blev förstörda och utredare kunde inte undersöka det.
Vad som inte hade hänt om det var ett jobb från insidan är att cirkus lastbilar med clowner hade kommit och fört bort stålet i lastbilar.
Vad som hade hänt är vad som hände, stål blev bortfört utan dom första utredarna var på plasts och folk var inte klara över vilka som skulle göra jobbet för dom fick ingen order eller hade inte makten att ta det i egna händer. och trevliga personer som rudy giuliani var en av dom som såg till så att stål blev förstört, samma rudy som gör business med terrorister från saudiarabien och gav brandmän radios som inte fungera på 9-11 (brandmän dog pga det) och sa att han fick en förvarning att tornen skulle kollapsa och sedan några år senare sa att han aldrig fick eller sa att han fick det.
Keith Olbermann: Rudy Giuliani's Ties to Terror:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIPc6wHAO28
orkare inte kopiera över allt här och markera dom viktiga delarna i svart för det är mycket text, och det behövs att makera för ni skeptiker gör ett bra jobb att undvika fakta och viktiga ord. allt är redan makerat här:
http://loosechange-911.blogspot.com/2007/02/wtc-evidence-obstruction.html
Där kan ni läsa allt om hur stålet blev förstört och hur dom inte hade någon tillgång till att undersöka det stålet som hade förklarat/bevisat varför tornen kollapsa, dom fick endast bitar som INTE kunde visa varför dom kollapsa. Alla som har läst NIST rapporten vet ju redan att dom inte bevisar kollapsen utan bara ger en teori.
som den före detta chefen James Quintiere, Ph.D. av brand vetenskap avdelningen på NIST har klagat på "stålet som hade bevisat varför tornen kollapsa blev förstört" sa han.
Lägg märke till den här infon från länken jag skicka ovan, hur utredarna klaga på att dom inte fick undersöka stålet och på att det blev förstört.
The BPAT did not control the steel:
Citat:
"No clear authority and the absence of an effective protocol for how the building performance investigators should conduct and coordinate their investigationwith the concurrent search and rescue efforts, as well as any criminal investigation: Early confusion over who was in charge of the site and the lack of authority of investigators to impound pieces of steel for examination before they were recycled led to the loss of important pieces of evidence that were destroyed early during the search and rescue effort. In addition, a delay in the deployment of FEMA's BPAT team may have compounded the lack of access to valuable data and artifacts."
The BPAT team does not plan, nor does it have sufficient funding, to fully analyze the structural data it collected to determine the reasons for the collapse of the WTC buildings
Citat:
"Uncertainty as to the strategy for completing the investigation and applying the lessons learned: The BPAT team does not plan, nor does it have sufficient funding, to fully analyze the structural data it collected to determine the reasons for the collapse of the WTC buildings. (Its report is expected to rely largely on audio and video tapes of the event.) Nor does it plan to examine other important issues, such as building evacuation mechanisms. Instead, FEMA has asked the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to take over the investigation. Yet so far, NIST has not released a detailed plan describing how it will take over the investigation, what types of analyses it will conduct, how it will attempt to apply the lessons it learns to try to improve building and fire codes, and how much funding it will require."
Citat:
"The efforts of NSF-funded researchers were impeded by the same obstacles the BPAT team encountered: an inability to examine the steel, either removed from the site during the early search and rescue work or shipped to recycling plants, and the denial of access to building design, construction and maintenance documents. (...)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquer...sel=TOC_32867&
Citat:
"In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the BPAT team, a significant amount of steel debris—including most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site".
http://gop.science.house.gov/hot/wtc/charter.htm
Citat:
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, an associate professor in the fire protection engineering department at the University of Maryland, said he believed the decision could ultimately compromise any investigation of the collapses."I find the speed with which potentially important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling."
Citat:
structural engineers have said that one serious mistake has already been made in the chaotic aftermath of the collapses: the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses that held up the buildings.That may have cost investigators some of their most direct physical evidencewith which to try to piece together an answer.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/nyt122501.html
And here are somes testimonies made before the Science Committee of the House of Representatives on March 6 2000:
Congressman Boehlert, Chairman of the Science Committee of the House of representatives:
Citat:
"I must say that the current investigation- some would argue that 'review' is the more appropriate word- seems to be shrouded in excessive secrecy" and "…valuable evidence has been lost irretrievably, and blueprints were unavailable for months."
http://commdocs.house.gov/committees...sy77747_0f.htm
In contrast to FEMA's investigation, which relied on volunteers from the ASCE, NIST's investigation was funded by Congress. However, NIST's investigation would not even start until virtually all of the steel had been removed from Ground Zero and recycled. On March 5, 2002, W. Gene Corley, leader of FEMA's Building Performance Study, testified to the House Science Committee about the need to further investigate the performance of buildings that were damaged or collapsed on 9/11/01. With his own study almost finished, Corley stated that it would take $40 million to adequately study the issue.
Citat:
The $40 million would cover the expense of stockpiling the steel and other debris; examining the steel; physically testing the steel; partial parametric computer modeling of the steel, the fire, the plane and the blast; and the examination of egress issues, says Corley. From the study, tools could be developed to address fire as a structural design load and to understand the behavior of structural connections under fire conditions. Tools also could be developed to look at strategies against progressive collapse
Corley's call for millions to stockpile and examine the steel appears disingenuous since, by the time of his testimony, nearly all of the steel had been recycled. His ASCE volunteers had saved 156 pieces of steel, most of them small "coupons" cut from larger pieces. NIST would not need special facilities to store the steel, of which it had received 41 pieces by May of 2002
I slutet fick NIST endast 236 bitar stål från WTC1-2 och 0 bitar från WTC7. som min första länk om stålet visar, källan är NIST.
Som Mr. crowley sa.
Citat:
Mr. CROWLEY. So no one even asked them politely to stop selling what, in all likelihood, could be evidence? (....)
But I do believe that conspiracy theorists are going to have a field day with this. They are going to make the Warren Commission look like a walk in the park. And that is unfortunate not only for the Members of Congress who are trying to work on this issue, but for all the families out there that are listening very carefully to what we are talking about today, what these experts are saying. And I just think there is so much that has been lost in these last six months that we can never go back and retrieve. And that is not only unfortunate, it is borderline criminal.
Vilket i sig inte säger någonting om det faktiska bevisläget, men däremot om vilka du ställer dig bakom i alla trådar du finns i: de som har makten och vill bevara status quo.
