Citat:
En och en halv timmes ohederlig globalistpropaganda är nog mer än vad de flesta orkar med, men tack för tipset ändå. Istället valde jag att läsa ditt tidigare inlägg om denne herre:We are all living in America - US Grand Strategy
Ja ett sätt att de på våra problem är att se dem som ett resultat av Amerikansk imperiepolitik som handlade om att implementera USAs modell av global liberal hegemoni i hela världen. Den fick sitt klimax under Barrak Hussein Obamas presidentskap och innebar att hela den av USA dominerade delen av världen skulle i rekordfart bli mångkulturell.
För något år sedan så lyfte jag fram denna föreläsning från John Hopkins universitetet av Walter Russel Mead där han förklarar USAs Grand Strategy från teori till praktik såsom den förkunnades under tiden innan Trump. Han inleder naturligtvis beskrivningen med ett stycke historia om egendomsfolkets flytt från Amsterdam till New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpl8TjlJPG4
En utmärkande del av den stora strategin för att implementera the Global Liberal World Order är att olika privata initiativ utgör en del av imperiepolitiken. Man förstår att den gode Mead leds av visionen att USA agerar som en hegeliansk världsande som krossar nationer och mindre imperier för att fullborda den slutliga liberala världsordningen som ju innebär historiens slut.
Ja ett sätt att de på våra problem är att se dem som ett resultat av Amerikansk imperiepolitik som handlade om att implementera USAs modell av global liberal hegemoni i hela världen. Den fick sitt klimax under Barrak Hussein Obamas presidentskap och innebar att hela den av USA dominerade delen av världen skulle i rekordfart bli mångkulturell.
För något år sedan så lyfte jag fram denna föreläsning från John Hopkins universitetet av Walter Russel Mead där han förklarar USAs Grand Strategy från teori till praktik såsom den förkunnades under tiden innan Trump. Han inleder naturligtvis beskrivningen med ett stycke historia om egendomsfolkets flytt från Amsterdam till New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpl8TjlJPG4
En utmärkande del av den stora strategin för att implementera the Global Liberal World Order är att olika privata initiativ utgör en del av imperiepolitiken. Man förstår att den gode Mead leds av visionen att USA agerar som en hegeliansk världsande som krossar nationer och mindre imperier för att fullborda den slutliga liberala världsordningen som ju innebär historiens slut.
(FB) Början på ett mediakrig om mångkulturen?
På Walter Russell Meads Wikipediasida står det bland annat att han kritiserat uppfattningen att det finns en mäktig Israellobby. Samtidigt skriver han den här typen av inlägg:
Why AIPAC Is Good For The Jews — and For Everyone Else
Citat:
Two cheers for AIPAC; this is not the most popular sentiment in the foreign policy world, where the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is often both feared for its power and loathed for an approach to Middle East policy that, in the opinion of its many critics is often seen as unsubtle, one-sided and unhelpful.
I’d agree that AIPAC isn’t always right, and like most of us is most confident and determined when it’s least helpful, but so what? In pasts posts I’ve shared my opinion that AIPAC is powerful less because of the money and energy that its (mostly Jewish) members bring to the table than because of the widespread sense in Washington that being pro-Israel is the popular position in the United States, and that if AIPAC blasts you as anti-Israel, the charge tends to stick. If you think US Middle Eastern policy should be less pro-Israel, attacking and bemoaning AIPAC won’t get you anywhere.
I’d agree that AIPAC isn’t always right, and like most of us is most confident and determined when it’s least helpful, but so what? In pasts posts I’ve shared my opinion that AIPAC is powerful less because of the money and energy that its (mostly Jewish) members bring to the table than because of the widespread sense in Washington that being pro-Israel is the popular position in the United States, and that if AIPAC blasts you as anti-Israel, the charge tends to stick. If you think US Middle Eastern policy should be less pro-Israel, attacking and bemoaning AIPAC won’t get you anywhere.
Citat:
All over the world, AIPAC and its ilk are held up as examples of the devious and insidious occult power of American Jews: ‘they’ control the media, ‘they’ buy and sell politicians and elections, ‘they’ are the puppet-masters who pull the strings. Many of the people who make these charges insist, with smug and tedious pomposity, that they aren’t anti-Semites. I’m sure some of them are right; Brutus says he is no anti-Semite, and Brutus is an honorable man.
Citat:
In the United States at least, lobbying for Zion turns out to be good for the Jews. The rise of AIPAC and other Jewish groups who make the case for stronger US support for Israel angers some international affairs specialists and others who think that on the whole the US-Israel relationship is bad for the United States. There definitely are groups of people who, while doing their level best to fight the temptation (so are they all honorable men), are so angry and so frightened by what they see as the Jewish juggernaut crushing dissent and imposing suicidal Middle Eastern policies on the stupidly passive American gentile population, sometimes cross that all-important line that separates the virtuously anti-Zionist from the vilely anti-Semitic.
Citat:
AIPAC, in other words, is good for the Jews, regardless of whether the positions it advocates are good for either Israel or the United States from a foreign policy perspective. And because AIPAC and its allies help defend this country against a potential upsurge in anti-Semitism, these groups provide a valuable public service that has nothing to do with the merits of the policies they support.
Citat:
Non-Jewish Americans may sometimes think that AIPAC and its allies go ‘too far’. They may think that Israel sometimes overreacts or reacts in counterproductive ways. That can be exasperating, but it is understandable. And that Jewish Americans have a soft spot for Israel makes sense to a lot of Americans. It’s no more un-American for Jews to back Israel a little too hard than it is un-American for Greek and Armenian Americans to get too emotional about Turkey.
Citat:
The basic point here for the kind of non-expert Americans–who in other times and other circumstances might be vulnerable to anti-Semitic concepts–is that Israel is on our side, its enemies are not, and the fact that Jews get emotional about this only means that they are a little too pro-American and, like the rest of us, sometimes need to take a deep breath and count to ten before acting on impulse. “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice,” Barry Goldwater once said — quoting Thomas Jefferson. Extremism in the defense of Israel, even if it is wrong, is endearingly wrong to many Americans. AIPAC’s militancy on the subject of Israel merely testifies to the depth and strength of the bonds that tie America and Israel together; it may sometimes go too far, but it goes too far in the right direction.
Citat:
The occasional attacks on Jewish-American activists for ‘dual loyalty’ are, from an anti-anti-Semitic standpoint, a small price to pay for helping to protect American culture against one of the greatest evils in modern life. As long as most non-Jewish Americans see a deep connection between Israel and the United States, the presence of an active and visible — even if sometimes one-sided and excessive — Jewish lobby is likely to dampen anti-Semitism more than promote it. For this, even those of us who sometimes disagree with AIPAC on policy specifics should be grateful. It is an important part of the American immune system that helps us over time to become a less racist, less anti-Semitic, more open society even as we retain our religious and cultural roots.
Man blir så trött.
__________________
Senast redigerad av Nebeltag 2019-01-04 kl. 13:27.
Senast redigerad av Nebeltag 2019-01-04 kl. 13:27.
