http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5iLBCkkC5l0NVV0gEYkAA04x83Wrg?docId=B32488671 291733403A00
Citat:
the first complainant, Miss A, said she was victim of "unlawful coercion" on the night of August 14 in Stockholm.
The court heard Assange is accused of using his body weight to hold her down in a sexual manner.
The second charge alleged Assange "sexually molested" Miss A by having sex with her without a condom when it was her "express wish" one should be used.
The third charge claimed Assange "deliberately molested" Miss A on August 18 "in a way designed to violate her sexual integrity". The fourth charge accused Assange of having sex with a second woman, Miss W, on August 17 without a condom while she was asleep at her Stockholm home.
Jag försöker få ihop detta, var det inte natten den 13 förut?
Var det inte Anna som gick ut i aftonbladet och sa att han inte var våldsam?
Hur kunde Finné lägga ned ett fall med: "inget brott har begåtts", om en man så tydligt "höll fast" henne? fast en del gillar ju sånt, var det ett verbalt nej - Anna kan ju annars tala för sig , en 30+kvinna med skinn på näsan - som saknades?