2013-05-03, 14:49
#865
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av CarolSeaver
[*]I Quick-fallet har vi vanderkwast, borgström, lambertz, personal på säter, en seriemördarkåt typ psykolog och en fullständigt bisarr kriminaljournalist på en andra rangens landsortstidning. Och lite till. Menar "ni" att det är en liknande situation som uppstått här, och att "alla" konspirerar för att sätta dit den fagra AK? Det kan säkert vara så, men då skulle man vilja veta bevekelesegrunderna person för person, på det sätt man tydligt kan ana i Quick-fallet.[/list]
Det är välkänt att sådant här kan inträffa vid uppmärksammade brott. Quickfallet visar inte på en konspiration mellan de personer du nämner utan på hur gärna man vill tro att man har rätt när man bestämt sig för vilken person man tror är mördaren, hur mycket prestige sedan spelar in för de inom rättsväsendet och hur alla varningssignaler viftas bort. Kan Quick verkligen vara denna hejdlöse seriemördare fast det är helt otroligt med en seriemördare med så olika tillvägagångssätt och offer och trots att Quick får svårt att ta sig till och vara på de platser där morden begicks när de begicks?
Se hur Lambertz vägrar överge den häst han satsat på för att inte förlora ansiktet. Tänk dig då hur det är i Italien där la faccia, att inte förlora ansiktet är en av de viktigaste sakerna i livet.
Douglas Preston:
Citat:
The power of face
So what's going on with this latest Knox verdict? It is essentially a prosecutorial face-saving effort. Most Americans cannot even begin to comprehend the deep and pervasive power of face, la faccia, in Italian culture. Four days after the murder, before the crime scene had been analyzed, police and prosecutors announced they had arrested the three killers -- Knox, her boyfriend, and a third man. Over the following weeks, as the crime scene was analyzed, they realized that not one speck of Knox's DNA could be found at the crime scene. Instead they discovered the DNA of an unknown fourth person everywhere, including inside the victim. He was soon identified as a drifter and drug dealer named Rudy Guede, who had fled the country.
In the United States, the prosecutor and police would more likely have admitted their mistake, released Knox and Sollecito and arrested Guede. But not in Italy, where to do so would involve a catastrophic loss of face. Instead, they went to great lengths to yoke Guede, Knox and Sollecito in a murderous conspiracy. This is why a year passed before Knox was charged with murder: that was how long it took to "develop" the evidence against her. This last verdict is one more step in the face-saving process.
Niccolo' Capponi, a distinguished Florentine historian, who is deeply knowledgeable about the workings of the judiciary, told me this new decision is "a case of dare un colpo al cerchio ed uno alla botte" -- give a blow to the ring and one to the barrel. In other words, to satisfy everyone. Yes, the prosecution would get their retrial, but only on certain points. And the trial was moved to Florence, a decidedly unfriendly venue for the prosecution team, where Knox has the best chance of being acquitted.
Knox is not required to be present at her retrial. If she is convicted and the Italians try to extradite her, the State Department will likely refuse, on the basis of the double jeopardy clause in our Constitution.
Many Italians are well aware that their judicial system is dysfunctional. The Italian judiciary is a holdover from the Benito Mussolini era, when Italy was a police state. If you're arrested for a crime in Italy, unless you can prove your innocence, you are in serious trouble indeed. The honor of police and prosecutors must be upheld, and the system is heavily biased against the accused. This latest decision to retry Knox was more about the saving of face than about finding the truth.
The power of face
So what's going on with this latest Knox verdict? It is essentially a prosecutorial face-saving effort. Most Americans cannot even begin to comprehend the deep and pervasive power of face, la faccia, in Italian culture. Four days after the murder, before the crime scene had been analyzed, police and prosecutors announced they had arrested the three killers -- Knox, her boyfriend, and a third man. Over the following weeks, as the crime scene was analyzed, they realized that not one speck of Knox's DNA could be found at the crime scene. Instead they discovered the DNA of an unknown fourth person everywhere, including inside the victim. He was soon identified as a drifter and drug dealer named Rudy Guede, who had fled the country.
In the United States, the prosecutor and police would more likely have admitted their mistake, released Knox and Sollecito and arrested Guede. But not in Italy, where to do so would involve a catastrophic loss of face. Instead, they went to great lengths to yoke Guede, Knox and Sollecito in a murderous conspiracy. This is why a year passed before Knox was charged with murder: that was how long it took to "develop" the evidence against her. This last verdict is one more step in the face-saving process.
Niccolo' Capponi, a distinguished Florentine historian, who is deeply knowledgeable about the workings of the judiciary, told me this new decision is "a case of dare un colpo al cerchio ed uno alla botte" -- give a blow to the ring and one to the barrel. In other words, to satisfy everyone. Yes, the prosecution would get their retrial, but only on certain points. And the trial was moved to Florence, a decidedly unfriendly venue for the prosecution team, where Knox has the best chance of being acquitted.
Knox is not required to be present at her retrial. If she is convicted and the Italians try to extradite her, the State Department will likely refuse, on the basis of the double jeopardy clause in our Constitution.
Many Italians are well aware that their judicial system is dysfunctional. The Italian judiciary is a holdover from the Benito Mussolini era, when Italy was a police state. If you're arrested for a crime in Italy, unless you can prove your innocence, you are in serious trouble indeed. The honor of police and prosecutors must be upheld, and the system is heavily biased against the accused. This latest decision to retry Knox was more about the saving of face than about finding the truth.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinio...ystem/2025167/