Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Smeso
Återigen ställde du helt fel fråga. Du frågade "is there a consensus among shroud of turin researchers that McCrones theories are wrong?"
Är det helt seriöst hur du tror att man ska fråga om man ska fråga om allmän konsensus? Du frågade ju bara vad STURP-forskarna anser.
https://www.academia.edu/102459586/Key_Statements_about_the_Turin_Shroud_as_a_Textile
Flury-Lemberg, Mechthild. “A cloth of inestimable worth,” in The two faces of the Shroud:
Pilgrims and Scientists Searching for a Face. Gian Maria Zaccone, ed. (Turin: Editrice ODPF),
2001, pp. 137-142.
STATEMENT: [Re: the stitching on the one long side of the Shroud, linking the large piece
with an 8-cm.-wide strip of the same fabric:] We can now prove that this dates back to when
the original cloth was made. The sheet was prepared professionally and its stitching can be
compared with that of fabric found in tombs at Masada (the Jewish fortress close to the Dead
Sea, which was destroyed in 73 AD). [Pp. 140-141]
Flury Lemberg hittade en fastsydd 'long strip' av samma typ av material (herringbone weave), som kan bevisas ha sytts fast samtidigt som svepningen skapades. Denna 'long strip' innehåller en viss typ av stygn som är helt unikt i världen och den enda platsen i världen där dom någonsin hittat liknande stygn har varit i masada, vilket är en 2-3 dagarspromenad från jerusalem. Staden masada förstördes år 70-73 av romarna.
Stygnet kan alltså spåras till just den tiden och platsen. Detta autenticiterar tyget.
Pappret innehåller mängder av liknande påståenden från textilexperter som alla kopplar tyget till autenticitet.
CONCLUSION
The majority of evidence seems to suggest that the Turin Shroud is from the Middle East in
the first century or could be. This includes multiple attestations by actual textile experts. The
only unequivocal assertion (in English) that I have found that says the Shroud was definitely
made in medieval Europe is by non-authenticist (as he likes to refer to himself) Hugh Farey. It
continues the prevalent pattern of non-authenticists/skeptics confidently (maybe arrogantly?)
putting forth their pontifications about the Shroud feeling that their opinions outweigh the
opinions of those who are neutral or pro-authenticity.
