Nationalism och geopolitik - en paradox.

During the debate, my mug and my bowtie were clearly visible in a way that Johnson’s face and whatever he was wearing were not. Instead of a live video, Johnson put up an icon of Janus with his two faces facing in opposite directions, also reminiscent of the symbol of Epimetheus and Prometheus, but even more indicative the two-faced nature of the man I was supposed to be debating.

The infallible sign that you’re dealing with a commissar arrives when the representative of the movement—be it conservatism or white nationalism—announces that it’s time to broaden the movement to include homosexuals. This is what Charlie Kirk did a few years back for conservatism; Greg Johnson did the same thing for white nationalism. The commissar in question could be doing this for personal reasons, or he could be doing it for money. Kirk is a Kochsucker. Johnson is a promoter of the homosexual agenda, and until he tells us why, we are free to conjecture that it may be because he is getting money or for more personal reasons.

During the course of the debate, however, Johnson made it clear that he is an avid supporter of the gay disco known as Ukraine. Johnson is an equally avid supporter of the narrative of the American empire. When I mentioned that he sounded as if he had been listening to CNN, he categorically denied ever having watched that network’s coverage of the war. He even endorsed fact checkers as a good source of information, while at the same time denouncing everything I mentioned as Russian propaganda, including commonplaces like Victoria Nuland’s role in the 2014 coup d’etat which overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected government.

Which brings me to my main point. Mr. Johnson’s position on the Ukraine is identical to the position of Jewish neocons like Max Boot and Bill Kristol. Mr. Johnson’s ultimate allegiance lies not with the White Nationalists but with the American Empire because that empire supports both homosexuality and the racial narrative. Like the two-faced Janus he chose as his symbol during our debate, Johnson is duplicitously willing to espouse white nationalism while using his supporters to advance the cause of the Great Satan who presides over the gay disco. Perhaps this is why talking with Greg Johnson is like talking to the devil. It’s not just because he is so ardent in defending the policies of the Great Satan. (If any of my Satanist friends are offended by this comparison, I apologize.) I say this because I have read Goethe’s Faust, and in that play Mephistopheles describes himself in the following way, “Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint.” Which roughly translates as “I am the spirit who constantly negates everything you say.” Which is the best characterization I can give of his performance in the debate. As Mr. Johnson must know from when he was a Catholic studying philosophy, evil is the privation of being. Every time I made a statement which corresponded to a category of reality, like my claims about Nuland, Johnson felt compelled to rob that statement of its being by denial. There are obvious connections between Johnson’s debating style and the sterility of homosexual intercourse, but these became apparent to me only after the fact. In the heat of logomachy, all I could feel was a sense of exasperation, which will become apparent if Frodi ever releases the recording of our debate.

I am a Russia Cheerleader

The basic reality is that you have as clearcut of a good guys vs. bad guys situation as you ever could imagine. The Ukraine, in 2014, was overthrown by the US State Department in a coup. They then started flooding the place with gay sex, feminism, and brown immigration. The Jews took complete control of the government and funded satanic neo-Nazi gangs to slaughter ethnic Russians.

The Ukraine is a horse of a different color, because this is not simply a situation of Jewish power being inflicted on a group of poor people in a country you’ve never been to. It is the manifestation of a global conflict between two competing world powers, and the outcome will turn the tide of world affairs. This is a defining moment in history, really the defining moment since the end of the USSR. It’s bigger than 911.

Back in April last year, we wrote about the inevitability of the denazification of Ukraine. Nazi, Bandera Ukraine, the enemy of Russia and the West's tool for the destruction of Russia, we do not need. Today, the issue of denazification has moved into a practical plane.
...

The nazification of Ukraine continued for more than 30 years, beginning at least in 1989, when Ukrainian nationalism received legal and legitimate forms of political expression and led the movement for "independence" towards Nazism.

The peculiarity of modern nazified Ukraine is in amorphousness and ambivalence, which make it possible to disguise Nazism as a desire for "independence" and a "European" (Western, pro-American) path of "development" (in reality - to degradation), to assert that in Ukraine "there is no Nazism , only private individual excesses". After all, there is no main Nazi party, no Fuhrer, no full-fledged racial laws (only their truncated version in the form of repressions against the Russian language). As a result, there is no opposition and resistance to the regime.

However, all of the above does not make Ukrainian Nazism a "light version" of German Nazism during the first half of the 20th century. On the contrary, since Ukrainian Nazism is free from such "genre" (essentially political technology) frameworks and restrictions, it freely unfolds as the fundamental basis of any Nazism - as European and, in its most developed form, American racism. Therefore, denazification cannot be carried out in a compromise, on the basis of a formula like " NATO - no, EU - yes." The collective West itself is the designer, source and sponsor of Ukrainian Nazism, while the Western Bandera cadres and their "historical memory" are only one of the tools for the Naziification of Ukraine. Ukronazism carries not less, but a greater threat to the world and Russia.

The name "Ukraine" apparently cannot be retained as the title of any fully denazified state entity in a territory liberated from the Nazi regime. The people's republics newly created in the space free from Nazism should and will grow from the practice of economic self-government and social security, restoration and modernization of the life support systems of the population.

In fact, their political aspirations cannot be neutral - expiation of guilt before Russia for treating it as an enemy can be realized only by relying on Russia in the processes of restoration, revival and development. No "Marshall Plans" should be allowed for these territories. There can be no "neutrality" in the ideological and practical sense, compatible with denazification. The cadres and organizations that are the instrument of denazification in the newly denazified republics cannot but rely on Russia's direct military and organizational support.

Denazification will inevitably also be a de-Ukrainization - a rejection of the large-scale artificial inflation of the ethnic component of self-identification of the population of the territories of historical Little Russia and New Russia, begun by the Soviet authorities. Being an instrument of the communist superpower, after its fall, artificial ethnocentrism did not remain ownerless. In this official capacity, he passed under the authority of another superpower (the power standing over the states) — the superpower of the West. It must be returned to its natural boundaries and deprived of political functionality.

Unlike, say, Georgia and the Baltic countries , Ukraine, as history has shown, is impossible as a nation state, and attempts to "build" one naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construction that does not have its own civilizational content, a subordinate element of an alien and alien civilization. Debanderization by itself will not be enough for denazification - the Bandera element is only a performer and a screen, a disguise for the European project of Nazi Ukraine, therefore the denazification of Ukraine is also its inevitable de-Europeanization.

The Bandera elite must be eliminated, its re-education is impossible. The social "bog", which actively and passively supported it by action and inaction, must survive the hardships of the war and assimilate the experience as a historical lesson and atonement for its guilt. Those who did not support the Nazi regime, suffered from it and the war unleashed by him in the Donbass, must be consolidated and organized, must become the pillar of the new government, its vertical and horizontal. Historical experience shows that the tragedies and dramas of wartime benefit peoples who have been tempted and carried away by the role of an enemy of Russia.

Greg Johnson April 9, 2022 at 7:59 am

I beg to differ. Russians announced that their aim is to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, i.e., to deprive them of any way to defend their sovereignty and to destroy their national self-consciousness, basically anything that would prevent them from being assimilated by Russia. That is cultural genocide.

No, EU and NATO membership don’t mean extinction for Ukraine. In fact, Ukraine would strengthen the nationalist and conservative nations already in the EU and NATO, like Hungary and Poland.

Russia is an evil imperialist regime with cultural genocide as its goal for Ukraine. China is an evil imperialist regime which is committing cultural genocide against the Tibetans and other minority groups. They are far worse than the West, in fact, because they do not allow any dissent to these policies, so there is little hope of reversing them.

Western liberal democracies are therefore far better for ethnonationalist politics than Russia or China.

Greg Johnson April 9, 2022 at 9:07 am

Russia is a far more dangerous threat to white survival than the West, because Russia is just as committed to ethnocide as the West, but in Russia it is also harder to change the regime.

It is in the interest of nationalism for the West in its current form to be defeated. So let’s do it. Vlad and the sick man of Eurasia are not up to the task, and they don’t care about white people any more than our own regimes.

Russia’s military action in Ukraine is meant to put an end to the US-dominated world order, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has explained. Washington has been seeking supremacy by imposing ad-hoc rules and violating international law, he claimed, in an interview aired by Russian television on Monday.