Leaving Neverland- Mer om Michael Jacksons påstådda pedofili

Wade Robson said about Michael Jackson : ‘’ Michael Jackson changed the world and more personally my life forever. He is the reason i dance , the reason i make music and one of the main reasons i believe in the pure goodness of human kind’’.
Wade Robson said : ‘’Michael Jackson was a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragementand his unconditional love will live inside of me forever’’.
Wade Robson said about Michael Jackson: ‘’ i will miss him immeasurably, but i know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk. I love you Michael’’.
Wade Robson said about Michael Jackson: ‘’The last time i saw him was July 2008. I was in Las Vegas working on a show and he was living there’’. Me, my wife and him and his three kids had a barbecue. It was the most normal thing in the world. Michael sat there under an umbrella …We had caring times because he was such a caring person.’’
Wade Robson claims Michael Jackson molested him from 1989–1996. Michael Jackson was investigated in the Chandler case in August 1993 when Wade was 10 years old. The statute of limitations extended 5 years to 1998 in Michael’s 1993 case which means Michael Jackson was still under investigation for any accuser to come forward. So Wade Robson claims that Michael Jackson was molesting him while under criminal investigation from the 1993 case?
Wade Robson was questioned at the same time he claims he was being molested after the 1993 case
Wade Robson withstood tough cross examination in a 2005 criminal trial that could have triggered ANY repressed memory
WADE ROBSON was THE FIRST WITNESS FOR THE DEFENSE in Michael’s 2005 trial. Robson was also a back-up dancer in an MTV Musical Tribute to MJ, led by Janet Jackson, after MJ died. He also added to a book that was written about MJ after his death. After MJ passed away, Robson did a zillion interviews defending MJ. Robson’s story changed when he realized that he was not going to get his dream job in that Cirque du Soleil MJ Tribute Show
Wade Robson swore UNDER OATH nothing happened
Wade wrote/spoke glowingly of Michael Jackson from 2005–2011 and even did tributes
Wade and his wife had Michael Jackson and his kids at his 2008 barbecue
Wade Robson perjured himself for 4 years prison term when he put his hand on the Bible Under Oath as a sexually active adult and said Michael Jackson didn’t touch him?
Wade Robson is cunning but not smart enough to have fooled Scott Ross the private investigator who aggressively cross examined potential witnesses to determine whether they were reliable or not to testify in 2005. He was 100% truthful in 2005 and he lied in 2013 and he is lying now for money. Also, no guilty person would ever risk calling his own abuse victim to the stand , especially when Robson’s testimony was NOT even necessary for Michael Jackson to win the 2005 trial.
Wade Robson is broke. He is officially bankrupt. So is Safechuck.
Wade was not selected for Michael Jackson’s Cirque du Soleil ‘’One’’ show in Vegas
Cirque Du Soleil and the Estate of Michael Jackson chose Jamie King over Wade Robson to direct the MJ ONE show
Wade Robson would sue Michael Jackson Estate AFTER he was NOT selected to choreograph Michael Jackson’s show !!!
In December 2017 Robson’s lawsuit against Michael Jackson’s Estate was dismissed. Safechuck’s lawsuit was also dismissed within 4 months and his original lawyers Marzano and Glandstein dropped him when they saw there zero chance winning the case. Safechuck alleged molestation AFTER he saw Wade Robson sue for money in 2013. However, he refused to testify for the Prosecution in 2005. A 28 year old man who was molested would not just watch a molester on trial. He would be eager to testify against Michael Jackson just like the Sandusky victims did. None of Sandusky’s victims defended him and no one refused to testify against him. Robson and Safechuck did the exact opposite of what the Sandusky victims did.
Brett Barnes called Wade Robson and James Safechuck greedy liars on twitter. He specifically wrote :’’ i wish people would understand that on your last moment on this earth all the money of the world will be of no comfort but my clear conscience will’’.
There's no way a pedophile would be investigated for 10 years and have their house raided just for nothing to be found.

Men utan den här filmen och allt det som Michael Jackson påstås ha gjort, alltså utan allt sådant som vi INTE säkert vet att han har gjort. Vad var det då för suspekt med hans beteende jämfört med andra vuxnas beteende, tex föräldrar som leker och har jätteroligt och har jättemysigt i sängen med sina barn?

Precis min poäng: Du lägger all din tilltro till dokumentären. Tänk om du hade läst alla miljoner sidor på internet som redogör för MJ's försvar INNAN du sett dokumentären. Då hade du kanske haft en helt annan syn och ett helt annat kritiskt tänkande.

Själva poängen med dokumentären är ju att MJ är monstret och Du ska tycka att han är monstret. Och du svalde betet med hull och hår. Grattis.

Själv har jag sett så många såna här dokumentärer, jag vet vad de går för.


Absolut, det kan mycket väl uppfattas så. Att MJ var naiv och att han aldrig ville såra ett barn. Jag tror på det. Och när han säger att han sov med dem så la han till "You're thinking SEX! But I sleep on the floor!". Och det är den naiviteten som är så talande när det kommer till MJ. Jag vet att MJ sov med barn (opassande enligt vuxna moralkärringar), men deras föräldrar sov också i rummen, men inte att de hade sex. MJ's sovrum var gigantiskt.

MJ hade helt enkelt pyjamasparty och julafton och allt det där senare i sitt liv när han äntligen fick och kunde ha det, utan att någon moralpredikare kunde peka finger åt honom och säga att han inte fick. MJ älskade barn, men gillade inte vuxna, eftersom han tyckte vuxna var manipulativa och krävde saker av honom hela tiden. Han kunde lita på barn, men inte på vuxna.

Robson submitted in court two contradictory versions.
Does anyone believe MJ was so dumb he put a victim on the stand so the prosecutors could grill him? For a real victim that would be extremely triggering , why would MJ take that risk when Rosbon's testimony was not even necessary to defeat the Arvizos?
What makes this story even more ridiculous is that in a deposition his mother said when she asked him why he didn't say anything he told her he felt shame. He has also echoed feeling shame in blog posts. Yet his court documents contradict this. Can you really believe a man who has two stories depending on his audience? In court he knew feeling shame wouldn't net him millions, so he had to claim he wasn't aware it was abuse. He can't get around the statute of limitations by claiming he felt shame.
Assuming Wade Robson was indeed unable to understand the concept of molestation in 2005 even though he was already 23. Why didn’t he say ‘’ Michael Jackson performed oral sex on me, masturbated me , licked my penis’’, ‘’ he did all that but that’s ok that’s not abuse ‘’ yet he said Michael Jackson never touched him ?
Corey Feldman, Emmanuel Lewis, Macaulay Culkin, Omer Batthi, Alfonso Riberio, Taj Jackson, Taryll Jackson, Sean Lennon, Mark Ronson are all twisted and sick too for consistently speaking highly of MJ and defending his innocence? Some of those boys were abused by other adults they knew the difference between him and MJ.
Take a look at Wade’s actions since he accused MJ like selling his picture on ebay, directing videos to an MJ fans, promoting himself with a video that included MJ moves, liking a post by Brian Friendman where he spoke postively about MJ, teaching his son dance with MJ's philosophy all the while claiming that he is so traumatized the he cannot dance anymore.
And keep in mind his mother and brother testified that Robson has financial problems so do the math. He has tried to profit from these BS allegations over and over again. This documentary is the latest effort time for the 10th anniversary of MJ's death.
Neither of them , Robson and Safechuck, acts like real abuse victims. I don't know any victim who repeatedly tried to profit from the claim that they were molested. They are both angry because their lawsuits were dismissed and they are trying to force the Estate to settle their cases.
Robson alleged he could not do entertainment activities anymore but this obviously is a lie. It is a well documented fact that he took part in many entertainment activities from his own social accounts.
Robson said the abuse started the second time they were in Neverland during the weekend before his family left. Then he said he was abused every single night. Robson claimed that Jackson abused him in his condo and he was alone there while his mother and his sister stayed at a hotel. His mother in her deposition said that she and her daughter also stayed in that condo. So which one is it? Was Robson alone with Jackson or did his mother and his sister stay in tha condo too? These are two contradictory stories. So Michael Jackson molested Robson without even grooming him first and under his mother’s nose?
If all these people that Robson alleges were more than willing to help Michael Jackson find abuse victims then how come the FBI or Sneddon who traveled all over the world to find alleged victims never found any evidence of this? How come no abuse victims other than Robson and Safechuck have come forward all these years, who BOTH DENIED molestation FOR YEARS? How come both Robson and Safechuck happened to have had nervous breakdowns during the exact same time? How come he said he never had any repressed memories yet it was his nervous breakdown he alleged helped him remember the child abuse he never forgot he experienced?
If as Robson said he didn’t understand what abuse is then why does he now claim that he lied to protect Michael Jackson? Why would he need to lie so as to protect Michael Jackson if he didn’t understand what he did was wrong? Why would Robson need to lie about the abuse, he always remembered, but he didn’t see it as such and thought it was consensual love?
Robson and Safechuck claim that MJ molested Mac Culkin who repeatedly denied it and testified it under oath. Culkin still refers to the allegations as ridiculous. Robson lies about other people being abused who have clearly denied it and they still do.
So Robson one day danced happy to Michael Jackson’s songs and the next day he was scarred because he suddenly realized at 29 the abuse he allegedly experienced which he didn’t realize during the 2005 trial ?
How come James Safechuck’s lawsuit was copypaste from hardcore pedophile and public advocate for the NAMBLA Victor Gutierrez, whom Michael Jackson sued for slander in 1998 ? Gutuirrez was ordered to pay Michael Jackson 2.8 million $ but he filed for bankruptcy and left for Chile. False accusers who copied a pro pedophilia fiction book.
How come Robson testified UNDER OATH in 2005 that Michael Jackson never showed him porn yet in his civil suit he claimed the exact opposite?
If Safechuck confessed to his mother in 2005 that he was indeed molested by Michael Jackson as he now alleges then why didn’t she do or say anything during a child rape trial? Robson didn ’t understand he experienced abuse while he testified as a sexually active adult on a sex abuse trial, Safechuck confessed his abuse to his mother but she did NOTHING and he refused to testify for the Prosecution? So from 2005 until 2011 when incidentally Robson lost the MJ one director job , all these people , Safechuck , his mother and Robson DID AND SAID NOTHING ? Why would Safechuck’s mother pretend that she didn’t know about her son’s abuse in 2005 which he allegedly confessed to her then?in that case Safechuck’s mother and Safechuck should be held responsible for withhodling key evidence from a criminal trial and Robson should be charged for commiting perjury twice.
Wade Robson defends Michael Jackson for 20 years , participates in tributes after his death, begs the Jackson family for an invitation to his Memorial Service , then gets rejected from Cirqe du Soleil show , then comes out of accusations of child molestation against him? He suddenly realized his alleged abuse then?
On the one hand Robson claimed he didn’t understand it was abuse he endured at Michael Jackson’s hands yet at the same time he claimed that the reason he didn’t come forward all these years is because he felt sorry for his kids. These two claims are contradictory. So were Robson and Safechuck unable even into their adulthood to realize that sex between a man and a child is wrong and abuse ( including anal and rape) , Safechuck told his mother the truth in 2005 , yet she did nothing , he refused to testify against Michael Jackson and Robson defended him because firstly he didn’t understand yet he had been abused but he also lied to protect Michael Jackson and his kids and Michael Jackson risked to have his own abuse victim testify for him?
Robson and Safechuck when asked questions about their relationship with their families after the premiere of the ‘’ documentary’’ started giggling and smiling . Firstly , what is funny about that and secondly why would they giggle if they watched the alleged molestation they experienced. One would think they would be at least sad.
Take for example Robson's lawsuit and deposition. In his lawsuit he described in detail how MJ molested him. Then in his deposition he said he didn’t believe anything out of the ordinary happened that night.

42. There are plenty of videos where Wade and his family states Michael never EVER touched him inappropriately and he’s absolutely innocent.

Äsch, jag har roligt. I normala fall hade jag blivit förbannad. Men det måste vara kaffet den här gången. Jag vill inte att de ska säga saker oemotsagda så att de som inte kan så mycket tar det som sanning, precis som de som ser den här dokumentären.

Känner du till några föräldrar som leker och har jätteroligt och har jättemysigt i sängen med andras barn?
För att inte tala om en vuxen karl som gör det på egen hand nattetid?

Kommer hända oavsett. Det är internet vi är på. Samma ställe där folk övertygar andra om att jorden är platt. Låt det sjunka in

Exempelvis faktumet att han var tvungen att ändra texten på sin webbsida efter att man upptäckt motsägelser i dokumentären. Det finns några bra informativa Youtubevideor som förklarar hålen mer ingående än jag kan göra i en Flashbackpost. Jag citerar ett inlägg där man går igenom en del av det nedan.

Jag har intresserat mig för det här ämnet och diskuterat det i exakt tio år. Du behöver lite bättre argument än "jag såg en dokumentär".

Städerskan som är en illegal invandrare som har sålt sin story för stora summor och sedan ändrat sin story ett antal gånger? https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/05/12/wades-witnesses-part-2/

Att föräldrar till sina biologiska barn gör det är helt normalt. Att barnlösa främmande män vill göra det med mer eller mindre okända barn är att betrakta som patologiskt, anser jag.

Okej så du har inte sett dokumentären och citerar någon annans slutsatser. Knivskarp analys du gjort.

Jo, det är bevisat. Exempelvis blev hans vittnesmål avfärdat av en domare med kommentaren att ingen vettig jurymedlem skulle tro på vad han sa. Han har ändrat texten på sin webbsida efter motsägelser i dokumentären och han har blivit påkommen med att ljuga om att han inte klarar av att lyssna på Michael Jacksons musik efter att en video där han dansar till Michael Jackson kom upp. Jag förstår att du är lite efterbliven och fäster dig vid det första bästa du ser och inte klarar av att höra bevis som säger emot din uppfattning, men detta är fakta.


På grund av vad jag har framfört.


Nej, det är grundlösa anklagelser av en person som bevisligen har ljugit förr. Att du inte klarar av att förstå det beror troligen på att du är lågbegåvad och inte kan ta in bevis som säger emot din uppfattning av saken.