Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
studentroland
Det där var ju en jättebra länk... läser man den och följer länkarna så hamnar man på denna sidan, där t.o.m. konstruktören av tvillingtornen själv, John Skilling säger att det krävdes en "controlled demolition" för att ta ner dem;
Skilling påstod i en intervju efter bombdådet mot WTC 1993 att folk hade räknat på ett fullastat plan - men Leslie Robertson (Lead Structural Engineer för wtc) som var den som påstås ha räknat håller inte med alls..
Citat:
The two towers were the first structures outside of the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707. It was assumed that the jetliner would be lost in the fog, seeking to land at JFK or at Newark
One architect working for the Port Authority issued a statement to the press, covered in a prominent article in The Times, explaining that Robertson's study proved that the towers could withstand the impact of a jetliner moving at 600 miles an hour. That was perhaps three times the speed that Robertson had considered. If Robertson saw the article in the paper, he never spoke up about the discrepancy. No one else issued a correction, and the question was answered in many people's minds: the towers were as safe as could be expected, even in the most cataclysmic of circumstances.
There were only two problems. The first, of course, was that no study of the impact of a 600-mile-an-hour plane ever existed. ''That's got nothing to do with the reality of what we did,'' Robertson snapped when shown the Port Authority architect's statement more than three decades later. The second problem was that no one thought to take into account the fires that would inevitably break out when the jetliner's fuel exploded.
http://scott-juris.blogspot.se/The%20Height%20of%20Ambition%20Part%20Four.pdf
Skilling avled dessvärre redan 1998 och har därför aldrig kunnat kommentera vad som hände 9-11.