Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av quark
Det är svårt för revisionisterna att bestämma vad Marsalek skriver. Ur
Lüftl-rapporten:
Jag begriper inte riktigt varför du anger ett citat ur Luftl rapporten som i sin tur citerar Marsalek. Skulle det ge något sorts stöd? För vad då?
Luftl rapporten är för övrigt precis som Rudolf rapporten och Leuchter rapporterna spikarna i kistan på alla fantasier om massgasningar av Judar.
http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/techniques/lueftl.html
Citat:
Thus, Lüftl, vindicated by the District Criminal Court of Vienna, could state with impunity:
1. In light of natural laws and technical possibilities vs. impossibilities, the mass gassings with Zyklon B, as they are described by ‘contemporaneous witnesses’ and ‘perpetrators who confessed’, cannot have taken place.
2. The Kurt Gerstein Statement is (verbatim) "a whopping lie".[59]
3. By virtue of the composition of the exhaust gases, mass gassings with Diesel exhaust fumes cannot have taken place. Had there really been execution chambers or ‘gas vans’ operating with exhaust gas, the Germans would have used the more efficient internal combustion engines, or the even more efficient wood-gas generators.
4. Crematoria chimneys do not spew flames during the cremation process. All ‘eyewitness’ testimonies asserting such a phenomenon are false.
5. The number of cremated victims is considerably exaggerated since the capacity of the crematoria would have been insufficient to handle mass gassings. The quantity of fuel actually used delimits the true number of bodies cremated.
6. No homicidal mass gassings took place in the concentration camp Mauthausen. The method of gassing described by witnesses is nonsense and would have been fatal for the executioners.[60]
7. Homicidal mass gassing using bottled carbon monoxide is technically impossible nonsense.
8. Auerbach’s attempt at discrediting the Leuchter Report[61] can easily be refuted by experiment.
9. Zyklon B and Diesel exhaust fumes have lost all credibility as alleged ‘murder weapons’ used in the "planned extermination of millions of human beings, especially Jews, as part of a program of planned genocide."
10. Natural laws hold true for ‘Nazis’ no less than for anti-Fascists.
11. Material evidence will refute the testimony of perjured ‘eyewitnesses’ and the confessions of ‘perpetrators’.
12. Should the objective and scientific investigation of the Holocaust nevertheless prove the "planned genocide by means of gas chambers", then the Revisionists too will have to accept this.
13. Who is it that wants to stifle any and all discussion of this topic by means of criminal laws, and for what reasons?
14. Are we entering an era of 1984 totalitarianism after all, albeit through the back door?
However, considering the new revised paragraph 3h) of Austria’s Prohibition Order, it seems to be necessary to advise others not to make similar claims today, since the above statements were made before the new law came into effect. A national-liberal Austrian publisher who published these statements in 1995 as part of a documentation of Lüftl’s case,[62] was charged with "Holocaust denial" according to the new §3h)[63] and consequently sentenced to 10 month imprisonment on probation and a fine of ÖS 240,000 ($24,000).[64]
Här är en länk som beskriver vad som hände Luftl efter rapporten.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndluftl.html
Jag skulle inte rekommendera en Österrikare att numera efter de nya lagarna, upprepa Luftls punkter.
Om man inte vill sitta 10 mån i fängelse och böta 24 000$.
") identifierat och som avlidit, tydligen?
