Citat:
ICCT Papers
The Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Performing Justice, Defending Democracy
By Prof. Dr. Beatrice de Graaf, Liesbeth van der Heide, Sabine Wanmaker & Daan Weggemans
On 24 August 2012, the judges of the Oslo District Court passed their final verdict in the case of Anders Behring Breivik, declaring Breivik criminally sane and legally responsible for the killing of 77 people during the bombing of government buildings in Oslo and the shooting spree on the island of Utøya on 22 July 2011. This ICCT – The Hague Research Paper examines to what extent the Breivik trial attained the goals of criminal justice: retribution, prevention, restoring democratic order and upholding the rule of law. Furthermore, it aims to determine if the trial contributed to the need for closure in society. The paper concludes that the trial did indeed have a positive impact on the coping mechanisms in Norwegian society and that most Norwegians viewed the trial as a positive counter-weight to the brutality of Breivik’s acts. Overall, the trial was viewed as an example of justice and as a trial that upheld the democratic values of Norwegian society – in stark contrast to Breivik’s values.
Download the paper here.
http://www.icct.nl/publications/icct-papers/the-anders-behring-breivik-trial-performing-justice-defending-democracy
Jag blev förvånad över att det var så vinklat. Det kändes inte trovärdigt alls. Vad är egentligen syftet med sådana här "forskningsstudier"?
Här har en "Breivikbloggare" kommenterat studien:
Citat:
International Centre for Counter-Terrorism on Commander Breivik
The ICCT (International Centre for Counter-Terrorism) recently published a research paper titled: The Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Performing Justice, Defending Democracy. Read it here:
http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-De-Graaf-et-al-The-Anders-Behring-Breivik-Trial-August-2013.pdf
In their introduction they state the trial upheld the democratic values of Norwegian society – in stark contrast to Breivik’s values. The tone is set with this statement, it should be self-evident that nowadays all it takes for a nation to be democratic is for it to proclaim that, it is in fact, democratic. Iran uses this strategy with great success.
Jag rekommenderar er verkligen att läsa hela inlägget för det finns en hel del intressanta saker som tas upp:
https://breivikreport.wordpress.com/
Citat:
The researchers claim that the trial creates a unique opportunity to bring several parties together: terrorists, state representatives, the judiciary, the audience, surviving victims, terrorist sympathizers, etc. However, they fail to mention that sympathizers were barred from the courts, nor do they mention that Breivik and many of his witnesses were not televised whenever they took the stand. All that the people watching from their TVs saw was Breivik making his “far-right” salute, sobbing witnesses, psychiatrists explaining how Breivik is sick in the head, and ‘experts’ who make a living by stringing politically correct half-truths together.