[WW2] - Obesvarade frågor om "Förintelsen"

"---Diese Gaskammermusik Website
widerlegt den ganzen Hoaxokotz Fabel!

Diese jüdischen Revisionisten und Gaskammer-Leugner gehen viel weiter als Faurisson, indem sie aus dem Arsch-Witz "Todeslager" einen Vergnügenslager machen. Für Faurisson war Arsch-Witz wenigstens ein Arbeitslager.

Hat jemand im Weltnetz das kurzes Video "Tanzen macht frei" von einem jungen Holländer gesehen? Es schickt sich, dass "Tanzen macht frei" geschmacklos sei, weil Hoaxokotz nicht all zu gut schmeckt.

Hier bei diesen Juden-Hololeugnern gibt es "Musik macht frei."

Erstaunlich die Vorrechte, die Juden haben, wenn es um jüdisches Leiden geht. Ein normaler Mensch (sinngemäß: Kuh-Goy) würde sofort in den Knast geworfen, wenn er ein so schönes Bild von dem Awshucks Camp gezeigt hätte.

Der aufgeblasene Holo-Brotfresser Teddy Adorno hat immer gesagt: "Nach Arsch-Witz kann es keine Poesie geben."

Ha! Ha! Ha! Teddy, du hast dich sehr geirrt und Quatsch geredet, weil während deiner Holyhoax-Fabel gab es im Arsch-Witz schon schöne Musik.

Fußnotiz: Ein äusserst interessanter Versprecher steht dabei, "L'INCROYABLE HISTOIRE DE L'ORCHESTRE DES DAMES D'AUSCHWITZ" Wenn est unglaublich ist, sollte man es nicht glauben. Mit ein Paar Worten ist ein große Wahrheit herausgerutscht.---"

1. Ingen order om att utrota judar.

2. Ingen plan för att utföra denna utrotning.

3. Ingen central organisation som skulle koordinera utförandet av en sådan plan.

4. Ingen budget, ingenting kan utföras utan pengar eller lån.

5. Ingen kontrollorgan, trots nödvändigheten av sådana i ett land som befinner sig i krigsstllstånd.

6. Inget vapen, det finns ingen expertundersökning av brottets vapen: varken av en gaskammare eller gasbuss.

7. Ingen kropp, för ingen har tillgång till ett obduktionsprotokoll som bevisar att en enda person mördats av giftgas.

8. Inga protokoll från någon rekonstruktion av brottet, trots att en rättslig undersökning av ett mord vanligtvis inkluderar en rekonstruktion av brottplatsen.

9. Inga vittnen kapabla att genomgå ett korsförhör angående brottets materiella aspekter. Under Torontorättegången, där någon för första gången vågade genomföra ett sådant korsförhör, blev de främsta "vittnena" förvirrade.

10. Ingen verifierad bekännelse, då Gersteinbekännelserna liksom Rudolf Höss bekännelse har visat sig sakna värde vid närmare undersökning och är därmed omöjliga att försvara (tom för Raul Hillberg).

"---It is the holohoax pushers who refuse to look at the REAL evidence and to offer rational comment. To them, the holohoax is a RELIGION. To the revisionists - or "deniers" - it is supposed to be an historical event, thus as open to critical examination as any other historical event.

The true believers are quick to state, "What difference does it make if there were few or many - it happened!" I'll tell you what difference it makes - MONEY. Reparations paid yearly to Israel and to over 3.7 million Jews world wide, on a yearly basis, are based on the SIX MILLION supposed "victims." Any REDUCTION in that number carries with it a REDUCTION of those reparations payments, thus hitting the scam artists where it hurts the most - in their pocket book!! NONE of the "survivors" and holohaox believers have yet answered one pertinent question. Let them try this one - Prof. Walter Sanning shows in his book, The Dissolution of European Jewry, that population statistics show that at the greatest range of the German military - over Europe and into Russia - at MOST, some 3.8 million Jews were inside that "net." Encyclopedia Britannica 1939 supports this.

Please explaining how, with 3.8 million Jews to start with - and 3.8 million today drawing payments as "survivors" - 6 million were gassed???!! The personal memoirs of Winston Churchill, Dwight Eisenhower, and Charles DeGaulle, comprise 10 volumes - over one million words. They were written between 1948 and 1959. PLEASE, Mr. or Ms. Holohoaxer, tell me WHY not ONE word is mentioned and ANY of the 10 volumes, about 6 million dead Jews, gassings, or an extermination program!! Come on - where is your vaunted "evidence?" And as far as citing "court victories" - there are no current courts wherein any FAIR trial can be held for those doubting the ridiculous holohoax. They are considered guilty going in, and the court is already bound to support the hoaxers - not even allowing factual, forensic, and scientific evidence that totally REFUTES the tattooed arms gang. And what does that tattoo prove?

Only that they have a tattoo. BIG DEAL!! I have a picture of a Bowie knife that killed 24 people. Of course, all the "proof" I have is my WORD that I've SWORN to - how would THAT stand up in a legitimate court? Face it, you phonies - your day of intimidation, browbeating, and uncivil tantrums is coming to a close. Your LIE is on the ropes, and it scares the hell out of you that you just MIGHT be exposed! So all you can do is call names, and cite "court victories" in kangaroo courts as "proof" of your so-called "extermination." You must keep turning any "debate" away from the intellectual, to the EMOTIONAL - because that is the only way you can keep "winning." High numbers of "believers" does not make you correct either. You are like those who opposed Galileo and Copernicus, who dared to say the earth revolved around the sun, not vice versa, and that the earth was ROUND, not flat. They were also punished for their unorthodox (but true) views. Your time is running out. Your lies are crumbling. THAT is why you react as you do.

TRUTH does not need the protection of the LAW to sustain it - it stands on its own. But you LIARS need the protection of LAWS to keep your naked emperor from being exposed. You have already LOST this battle for TRUTH. You just keep getting paid for your lies. But that, too, will stop. And when it does, the results are going to be fascinating.---"

f. The Thesis of the Transit Camp

The revisionist studies mentioned to this point have restricted themselves exclusively to refuting the official picture of Treblinka as an "extermination camp." An alternative interpretation of its function has not appeared in these studies, which of course is the direct consequence of the complete lack of contemporary documents. Yet some notable revisionist authors have proposed the thesis that Treblinka was a transit camp for Jews. The American scholar Prof. Dr. Arthur R. Butz suggested in his revisionist classic The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which appeared for the first time in 1976, that Treblinka simultaneously served as a labor camp as well as a transit camp for Jews resettled to the east,[109] and Prof. Robert Faurisson also supports the transit camp thesis.[110]

Finally, US historian Mark Weber, together with US lawyer Andrew Allen, wrote an excellent article about Treblinka in 1992, in which the two authors summarized all the familiar arguments made to that point in time against the thesis of the 'extermination camp,' introduced new viewpoints in the field, and wrote concerning the actual nature of the camp:[111]

"If Treblinka was not an extermination center, what was it? [...] the balance of evidence indicates that Treblinka II - along with Belzec and Sobibor - was a transit camp, where Jewish deportees were stripped of their property and valuables before being transferred eastwards into German-occupied Soviet territories."

Since Treblinka was much too small to be able to accommodate the large number of Jews deported there at the same time, the transit camp thesis is, in fact, the single plausible alternative to the conventional picture of the extermination camp. Tertium non datur - no third possibility is given.---"

"---In this section we wish to demonstrate not so much the differences in the numerical data of the various authors as the incredible superficiality and illogic of their method. Since they are all speaking not only of deportees, but of people murdered - therefore of people who are supposed to have been killed by means of exactly described techniques - the shocking method of their calculations is coupled with an astonishing lack of critical intellect, which often verges on dullness and is strikingly apparent when compared with the two isolated representatives of official historiography who have brought at least a modicum of critical thinking to this field.

In the year 1953, Gerald Reitlinger was already writing:[268]

"It would in any case have been impossible to gas the greater part of the 310,000 Jews who were deported from Warsaw, together with an unknown proportion from other ghettos, in three gas chambers, each measuring fifteen feet square, in no more than seventy-five working days."

Faced with salvaging what could be salvaged in light of this impossibility, he deduced:[268]

"Therefore a large proportion must have died in the trains."

This is likewise an untenable claim: according to the train schedule no. 548 of August 3, 1942, the trip from Warsaw to Treblinka in particular lasted only 3 hours and 55 minutes,[269] and even if the conditions in the overcrowded trains were execrable, under no circumstances could they have resulted in a mass-dying among the occupants.

In an interview granted by Jean-Claude Pressac in 1995, which was published for the first time in 2000 with changes made according his wishes, Jean-Claude Pressac proposed his own original statistics for the alleged victims of the eastern camps, in which he started fundamentally with their attested capacity for extermination:[270]

"I have attempted to determine the number of victims of the camps designated as extermination camps on the basis of material facts: the surface area of the gas chambers and number of the persons which they could hold; time for a gassing; number of gassings daily; number of transports arriving daily with consideration of the actual capacity of the chambers, etc. In comparison with the numbers of Hilberg, which are based upon Polish sources, I arrive at the following figures:

*

Chemno: 80,000 to 85,000 instead of 150,000;
*

Belzec: 100,000 to 150,000 instead of 550,000;
*

Sobibor: 30,000 to 35,000 instead of 200,000;
*

Treblinka: 200,000 to 250,000 instead of 750,000;
*

Majdanek: fewer than 100,000 instead of 360,000;"[271]

If we take the lowest of his estimates, Pressac therefore reduces the total number of victims of these five 'extermination camps' (Auschwitz is not considered in the statistics) from 2,010,000 to 510,000. But the number given by him for Majdanek - the only one of these camps from which documentary data were obtained - is still more than double the actual number, for the documents reveal that in Majdanek about 42,300 (Jewish and non-Jewish) prisoners died.[272] One page later Pressac adds:

"Concerning the massacre of the Jews, several fundamental notions must be questioned. The given numbers [by official historiography] are to be thoroughly revised. The expression 'genocide' is no longer suitable."

Since Pressac does not rely upon documents, but merely upon the theoretical maximum capacity of extermination facilities, whose existence remains unproven, his numbers are of course extremely contestable, but one thing is certain: whoever speaks of a mass extermination in Treblinka - to confine ourselves here to this camp - cannot blindly accept the monstrosities claimed by the witnesses and is not released from the duty of soberly taking into consideration that, which Pressac calls "material facts." We shall return to this point in the following chapter.---"