Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Bowmoresfinest
Haha ja eller hur! Du har ju sagt att det är så då är det så.. Bra där
Vetenskapliga fakta! Har du nåt innaför pannbenet förstår du själv att det finns så mkt annat som spelar in än några siffror på hur starkt androgen o anabolt ett prepp är
Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) all carry their own anabolic and androgenic rating and such rating is based on the primary steroid testosterone. Testosterone carries with it an anabolic rating of 100 and an androgenic rating of 100 and it is by this rating in-which all other steroids are measured in each regard. The higher its rating is in a particular category the higher its nature is to that end in-terms of its makeup but interestingly enough this does not always translate into action. Take for example Trenbolone,
the Trenbolone hormone has an anabolic rating of 500 and an androgenic rating of 500 and performs mirroring such ranking. Then take the Fluoxymesteron (Halotestin) its anabolic and androgenic ratings blow Trenbolone out of the water, in-fact its androgenic rating is 850 but it provides absolutely no androgenic traits to the user. Why is this important? As you recall, for a steroidal hormone to provide an androgenic benefit it must necessarily bind to the androgen receptors; regardless of how androgenic in nature the particular hormone is if it has a poor androgen receptor binding ability it will provide no androgenic action. This is the case of steroids such as Halotestin which carry with it little to no binding affinity and even some DHT based steroids such as Stanozolol (Winstrol) making them almost useless in-terms of building size but as you may already know, due to their anabolic nature they can still be very useful.
Then we have anabolic androgenic steroids with positive androgen binding ability yet produce little in-terms of massive growth but can still be very useful. Recall, androgens not only promote size but fat-loss as well or more aptly increased metabolic activity; when we couple this with solid anabolic activity we have a worthwhile steroid of an androgenic nature although weak in-terms of size or growth; Primobolan being a prime example. As you should be easily able to see, as it pertains to the anabolic and androgenic rankings while the anabolic ranking of a steroid lends to a strong understanding of the particular steroids power the androgenic rating tells us very little unless we understand how well it binds to the androgen receptors.
Så när du lär dig engelska om du lär dig engelska, så kanske du inser hur sönderknullad du blev av mig, men jag tvivlar på att du någonsin kommer att förstå hur fel du hade. Jag kommer fortsätta att kopiera in den här texten spelar ingen roll hur många sidor som går, om du börjar tjafsa om det igen då kommer den enbart kopieras igen så alla kan se vilken idiot du är (om och om igen). Så det är ingen ide att du håller på, du hade totalt fel ta det som en man och gå vidare istället...
Källa
http://www.steroid.com/Anabolic-Androgenic-Steroids.php
