🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
The "Disinformation Playbook", particularly as it applies to the tobacco industry, refers to a set of strategic tactics used to mislead the public, delay regulation, and protect corporate interests—despite overwhelming scientific evidence of harm. These tactics have since been adopted by other industries (like fossil fuels, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals). Here's a summary of the key bullet points or tactics often cited in the playbook:
🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
1️⃣ The Fake Experts TacticPromote individuals with impressive credentials but little or no expertise in the relevant field.2️⃣ The Cherry-Pick Tactic
Use them to dispute or downplay mainstream science.Select only favorable data while ignoring the vast body of contradictory evidence.3️⃣ The Attack the Scientists Tactic
Highlight outliers or fringe studies to create the illusion of controversy.
Harass, discredit, or question the motives of legitimate researchers.4️⃣ The Manufacture Uncertainty Tactic
Frame scientists as biased, politically motivated, or part of a conspiracy.Emphasize “uncertainty” and “more research is needed” to stall policy decisions.5️⃣ The Buy Influence Tactic
Frame scientific consensus as debatable, even when it’s not.Fund research institutions, universities, and think tanks to shape the narrative.
Lobby policymakers and regulatory agencies to weaken or block regulations.
🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
The "Disinformation Playbook", particularly as it applies to the tobacco industry, refers to a set of strategic tactics used to mislead the public, delay regulation, and protect corporate interests—despite overwhelming scientific evidence of harm. These tactics have since been adopted by other industries (like fossil fuels, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals). Here's a summary of the key bullet points or tactics often cited in the playbook:
🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
1️⃣ The Fake Experts TacticPromote individuals with impressive credentials but little or no expertise in the relevant field.2️⃣ The Cherry-Pick Tactic
Use them to dispute or downplay mainstream science.Select only favorable data while ignoring the vast body of contradictory evidence.3️⃣ The Attack the Scientists Tactic
Highlight outliers or fringe studies to create the illusion of controversy.
Harass, discredit, or question the motives of legitimate researchers.4️⃣ The Manufacture Uncertainty Tactic
Frame scientists as biased, politically motivated, or part of a conspiracy.Emphasize “uncertainty” and “more research is needed” to stall policy decisions.5️⃣ The Buy Influence Tactic
Frame scientific consensus as debatable, even when it’s not.Fund research institutions, universities, and think tanks to shape the narrative.
Lobby policymakers and regulatory agencies to weaken or block regulations.
🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
The "Disinformation Playbook", particularly as it applies to the tobacco industry, refers to a set of strategic tactics used to mislead the public, delay regulation, and protect corporate interests—despite overwhelming scientific evidence of harm. These tactics have since been adopted by other industries (like fossil fuels, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals). Here's a summary of the key bullet points or tactics often cited in the playbook:
🔹 The Five Classic Tactics in the Tobacco Disinformation Playbook:
1️⃣ The Fake Experts TacticPromote individuals with impressive credentials but little or no expertise in the relevant field.2️⃣ The Cherry-Pick Tactic
Use them to dispute or downplay mainstream science.Select only favorable data while ignoring the vast body of contradictory evidence.3️⃣ The Attack the Scientists Tactic
Highlight outliers or fringe studies to create the illusion of controversy.
Harass, discredit, or question the motives of legitimate researchers.4️⃣ The Manufacture Uncertainty Tactic
Frame scientists as biased, politically motivated, or part of a conspiracy.Emphasize “uncertainty” and “more research is needed” to stall policy decisions.5️⃣ The Buy Influence Tactic
Frame scientific consensus as debatable, even when it’s not.Fund research institutions, universities, and think tanks to shape the narrative.
Lobby policymakers and regulatory agencies to weaken or block regulations.
- Kvoten verkliga fall?Om inte, vad kan det bero på tror du?
- Kvoten (endast) 'bättre diagnoser'?
1. Få ett slut på autism-pandemin.Hur någon kan få det här till något dåligt är svårt att förstå om man inte läst in sig lite på psykopati och sociopati.
2. På bästa sätt bota/lindra symtomen hos de redan drabbade.
3. Utkräva ansvar av de som ligger bakom.
4. Reformera 'public health' i USA och därmed i olika grad i resten av världen.
- Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of Totalitarianism (2022)Om hur 'ondska' gradvis blir systemisk och i allt större utsträckning gynnar psyko- och sociopater i en självförstärkande loop.
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera