Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
SkogsSaab
Med ditt inlägg så läser jag in att ljugtaktiken från Kreml faktiskt fungerar på vissa individer.
Några frågor, du påstår att Ryssland satte press på separatisterna för att uppfylla minskavtalen? Hur kan det då komma sig att det var Rysska reguljära styrkor som vägrade dra sig tillbaka och såg till att avtalen i te kunde följas?
Givetvis försökte Kreml få till en fred? Då de åkte på smisk, en fredsavtalet var ju av samma karaktär som från början.
Vi slutar slåss om vi får stora delar av ert land får välja er regering och avrätta personer i ert land som vi tycker skall avrättas.
Själv ser jag mest intervjun som ett bevis på Kremls agenda att kopiera Nazityskland.
Jag litar inte heller på Kreml eller Putin. Jag köper inte heller Putins historiska argument. För mig är människan i centrum. Människor i varje region bör själva kunna välja hur de styrs. Detta oavsett om det gäller Krim, Donbass, Donetsk eller Taiwan.
När det gäller Minskavtalet kan du själv läsa i artikeln att Ryssland hade för avsikt att fullfölja det
Citat:
During recent weeks, as though in a preplanned chain of events, Russian officials have become remarkably active in stating that the Russian government wants the self-proclaimed republics to remain part of Ukraine.
"At all levels, including the presidential one and in other formats, we say that we want [these republics] to become part of Ukraine," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told government newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta last week.
"They have unveiled their own constitution project in which they talk about their status as envisaged by the Minsk agreements: The republics will become part of Ukraine, followed by constitutional reform that will solidify this status into a permanent one," he said.
Putin upprepade att han ville fullfölja Minsk-avtalen
i sin essä innan kriget:
Citat:
Russia has done everything to stop fratricide. The Minsk agreements aimed at a peaceful settlement of the conflict in Donbas have been concluded. I am convinced that they still have no alternative. In any case, no one has withdrawn their signatures from the Minsk Package of Measures or from the relevant statements by the leaders of the Normandy format countries. No one has initiated a review of the United Nations Security Council resolution of 17 February 2015.
During official negotiations, especially after being reined in by Western partners, Ukraine's representatives regularly declare their ”full adherence“ to the Minsk agreements, but are in fact guided by a position of ”unacceptability“. They do not intend to seriously discuss either the special status of Donbas or safeguards for the people living there. They prefer to exploit the image of the ”victim of external aggression“ and peddle Russophobia. They arrange bloody provocations in Donbas. In short, they attract the attention of external patrons and masters by all means.
Apparently, and I am becoming more and more convinced of this: Kiev simply does not need Donbas. Why? Because, firstly, the inhabitants of these regions will never accept the order that they have tried and are trying to impose by force, blockade and threats. And secondly, the outcome of both Minsk‑1 and Minsk‑2 which give a real chance to peacefully restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine by coming to an agreement directly with the DPR and LPR with Russia, Germany and France as mediators, contradicts the entire logic of the anti-Russia project. And it can only be sustained by the constant cultivation of the image of an internal and external enemy. And I would add – under the protection and control of the Western powers.
