Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Ola Schubert
Sant, men man kan, ändå, inte veta, till 100 procent,hur man reagerar på en ny virus variant.
Inte heller hur man reagerar på ett nytt vaccin. Har man haft viruset har man en god uppfattning, men fortfarande 100 % osäkerhet om hur man reagerar på vaccinet.
Men det är inte bara det, utan att det är så anstötligt att det ska tjatas på folk att de ska utsatta sig för ett medicinskt ingrepp som de nog inte behöver, bara för att förhindra en förkylning som ändå inte stoppas av vaccinet.
Hur är man funtad i huvudet för att hålla på som du?
Varför skulle jag prackas på nåt jag inte behöver bara för att det är nästan ofarligt? Dessutom producerat och marknadsfört av en suspekt farmakologisk jätte. Varför skulle jag lita på dem, hör här:
Pfizer has been accused of aggressive pharmaceutical marketing.
Illegal marketing of gabapentin for off-label uses
In 1993, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gabapentin only for treatment of seizures. Warner–Lambert, which merged with Pfizer in 2000, used continuing medical education and medical research, sponsored articles about the drug for the medical literature, and alleged suppression of unfavorable study results, to promote gabapentin. Within five years, the drug was being widely used for off-label uses such as treatment of pain and psychiatric conditions. Warner–Lambert admitted to violating FDA regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses.[155] In 2004, the company paid $430 million in one of the largest settlements to resolve criminal and civil health care liability charges. It was the first off-label promotion case successfully brought under the False Claims Act.[156] A Cochrane review concluded that gabapentin is ineffective in migraine prophylaxis.[157] The American Academy of Neurology rates it as having unproven efficacy, while the Canadian Headache Society and the European Federation of Neurological Societies rate its use as being supported by moderate and low-quality evidence.[158]
Illegal marketing of Bextra
In September 2009, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the illegal marketing of arthritis drug valdecoxib (Bextra) and agreed to a $2.3 billion settlement, the largest health care fraud settlement at that time. Pfizer promoted the sale of the drug for several uses and dosages that the Food and Drug Administration specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The drug was pulled from the market in 2005.[159][160] It was Pfizer's fourth such settlement in a decade.[161][162][163] The payment included $1.3 billion in criminal penalties for felony violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and $1.0 billion to settle allegations it had illegally promoted the drugs for uses that were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) leading to violations under the False Claims Act as reimbursements were requested from Federal and State programs. The criminal fine was the largest ever assessed in the United States to date.[160][161][162][163] Pfizer entered a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General that required it to make substantial structural reforms within the company, and publish to its website its post approval commitments and a searchable database of all payments to physicians made by the company.[164]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfizer
Och du tycker man ska lita naivt och blåögt på dem för att uppnå din omhuldade "hybridimmunitet"? De är ju rena skurkarna, och vägrar släppa ifrån sig dokumentation, för att undandra sig granskning av vetenskapsamhället. Hur kan någon vilja tvinga på små barn deras produkter?
Tror du att de plötsligt blivit änglar?
