Rösta fram årets bästa pepparkakshus!
Inte vad jag vet, men det finns annat som korrelerar ganska bra med temperaturen.
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/geomag/aastar.html
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/
Ops! NASA har visst missat att städa undan detta dokument.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ra08500r.html
Det där har vi redan debunkat i ett tidigare inlägg. Temperaturen började öka minst 20 år innan svaveldioxidhalten i atmosfären började minska. Hur förklarar du detta?
Temperaturen steg av ökad CO2, sedan tog svavelutsläppen över och temperaturen sjönk igen, tills man åtgärdade svavlet.
Citat:
Inte vad jag vet, men det finns annat som korrelerar ganska bra med temperaturen.
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/geomag/aastar.html
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/
Ops! NASA har visst missat att städa undan detta dokument.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ra08500r.html
Citat:
A possible relationship between major changes in global ice volume, geomagnetic variations, and short-term climate cooling has been investigated through a study of climate and geomagnetic records of the past 400,000 yr. Calculations suggest that redistribution of the Earth's water mass can cause rotational instabilities that lead to magnetic excursions; these magnetic variations in turn may lead to rapid coolings through several proposed mechanisms. Such double coincidences of magnetic excursions and sudden cooling and glacial advance at times of major ice-volume changes have occurred at about 13,500, 30,000, 110,000, and 180,000 B.P. The last four and possibly five times of maximum eccentricity of the Earth's orbit were closely followed by magnetic excursions; catastrophic cooling and rapid ice buildup accompanied several of these excursions. Thus, Milankovitch cycle parameters may lead to glaciation through both insolation changes and geomagnetic effects on climate.
Citat:
Få se om du och Snullerux avfärdar detta också:
Climate myths: The cooling after 1940 shows CO2 does not cause warming
After rising rapidly during the first part of the 20th century, global average temperatures did cool by about 0.2°C after 1940 and remained low until 1970, after which they began to climb rapidly again.
The mid-century cooling appears to have been largely due to a high concentration of sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere, emitted by industrial activities and volcanic eruptions. Sulphate aerosols have a cooling effect on the climate because they scatter light from the Sun, reflecting its energy back out into space.
The rise in sulphate aerosols was largely due to the increase in industrial activities at the end of the second world war. In addition, the large eruption of Mount Agung in 1963 produced aerosols which cooled the lower atmosphere by about 0.5°C, while solar activity levelled off after increasing at the beginning of the century
The clean air acts introduced in Europe and North America reduced emissions of sulphate aerosols. As levels fell in the atmosphere, their cooling effect was soon outweighed by the warming effect of the steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases. The mid-century cooling can be seen in this NASA/GISS animation, which shows temperature variation from the annual mean for the period from 1880 through 2006. The warmest temperatures are in red.
Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming/#ixzz6aZ3shEG3
Climate myths: The cooling after 1940 shows CO2 does not cause warming
After rising rapidly during the first part of the 20th century, global average temperatures did cool by about 0.2°C after 1940 and remained low until 1970, after which they began to climb rapidly again.
The mid-century cooling appears to have been largely due to a high concentration of sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere, emitted by industrial activities and volcanic eruptions. Sulphate aerosols have a cooling effect on the climate because they scatter light from the Sun, reflecting its energy back out into space.
The rise in sulphate aerosols was largely due to the increase in industrial activities at the end of the second world war. In addition, the large eruption of Mount Agung in 1963 produced aerosols which cooled the lower atmosphere by about 0.5°C, while solar activity levelled off after increasing at the beginning of the century
The clean air acts introduced in Europe and North America reduced emissions of sulphate aerosols. As levels fell in the atmosphere, their cooling effect was soon outweighed by the warming effect of the steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases. The mid-century cooling can be seen in this NASA/GISS animation, which shows temperature variation from the annual mean for the period from 1880 through 2006. The warmest temperatures are in red.
Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming/#ixzz6aZ3shEG3
Det där har vi redan debunkat i ett tidigare inlägg. Temperaturen började öka minst 20 år innan svaveldioxidhalten i atmosfären började minska. Hur förklarar du detta?
Citat:
Ni debunkar ju allt automatiskt, som robotar, så det betyder ju inget.Temperaturen steg av ökad CO2, sedan tog svavelutsläppen över och temperaturen sjönk igen, tills man åtgärdade svavlet.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
