När man blåser bort rökridåerna och de uppblåsta superlativen från de högljudda liberala gaphalsarna (både här på flashback och i MSM) så ser man att det är något lurt med hela Flynn-storyn. De som följer Q vet att han är en nyckelperson. De som har följt med längre än så vet att Flynn under Obama var chef för DIA = Defense Intelligence Agency, dvs, USA:s militärs egna underrättelsetjänst. Vilka är det bland annat som ligger bakom Q och Trump? USA:s militär.
2015 gick Flynn ut offentligt i en intervju med Al-Jazeera och avslöjde hur Obama-administrationen och USA:s allierade stöttade framväxten utav IS i Syrien, något som pekats ut i en rapport från DIA 2012 (när Flynn var chef):
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-rise-of-islamic-state-was-a-willful-decision-of-the-obama-white-house-former-dia-chief/5467966
Citat:
In Al Jazeera’s latest Head to Head episode, [2015] former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael Flynn confirms to Mehdi Hasan that not only had he studied the DIA memo predicting the West’s backing of an Islamic State in Syria when it came across his desk in 2012, but even asserts that the White House’s sponsoring of radical jihadists (that would emerge as ISIL and Nusra) against the Syrian regime was “a willful decision.”
Amazingly, Flynn actually took issue with the way interviewer Mehdi Hasan posed the question—Flynn seemed to want to make it clear that the policies that led to the rise of ISIL were not merely the result of ignorance or looking the other way, but the result of conscious decision making:
Den här artikeln sammanfattar åtalet mot Flynn ganska bra:
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/446810-flynn-trump-russiagate-spies/
Citat:
President Donald Trump’s ill-fated first national security adviser Michael Flynn will twist in the wind for another three months or more, before he can face a sentence for getting caught in a FBI ambush while doing his job.
Citat:
At one point in the hearing, Judge Emmett Sullivan urged Flynn to reconsider his guilty plea, telling him that the violation he was admitting to amounted to treason – only to walk back the comments minutes later. The media, predictably, gave far more coverage to the original statement than the retraction. It’s the perfect example of the collective hysteria that has followed Flynn’s case from the very beginning.
Samma hysteri känns igen här på flashback. Inte sant?
Citat:
Despite the publication of FBI documents showing that agents interviewing Flynn in January 2017 did not think he misled them, intentionally or otherwise, about the content of his conversations with Russian ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak, Flynn chose to stand by his guilty plea from a year ago. His reasons for this are a mystery. What is not a mystery, however, is how the people involved in railroading Flynn are the same ones implicated in the institutional #Resistance to the Trump administration.
In the orgy of sensationalist reporting that has gripped the US mainstream media for the past two years, Flynn’s actual transgression has been lost to the din of shouting “treason” and “RUSSIA.” What he pleaded guilty to is lying to FBI investigators about his calls with Kislyak. The contacts themselves were right and proper, mind you: it was literally his job to reach out to foreign diplomats on behalf of the president-elect. So, why was the FBI even probing them?
Citat:
Within days of Trump’s inauguration, two FBI agents came to interview Flynn about his conversations with Kislyak. They told him he didn’t need a lawyer present. One of the agents was Peter Strzok – who would later be revealed as rabidly anti-Trump, thanks to text exchanges with FBI lawyer Lisa Page uncovered by the DOJ inspector-general.
Flynns kontakter med utländska representanter (I det här fallet Rysslands ambassadör Kislyak) i egenskap av president-elect Trump:s säkerhetspolitiska rådgivare och som ledare för USA:s nationella säkerhetsråd var helt i sin ordning, det ingår i själva jobbet. Vad han åtalats för är att han själv erkänt att han ljugit om förekomsten av dessa kontakter med FBI. FBI själva har dock rapporterat (trots att förhöret med Flynn hölls utav den rabiate Trumphataren och numera avskedade FBI-agenten Peter Strok, att Flynn inte har vilselett FBI.
Alltså, Flynn har erkänt ett brott som ingen påstår att han har begått.
Citat:
Yet despite two years and near-infinite resources, the best both Comey and Mueller could come up with to tie Trump to Russia has been the “salacious and unverified” (in Comey’s own words) Steele Dossier – a collection of claims bought and paid for by Clinton’s campaign, using the Democratic Party and its law firm Perkins Coie as cutouts.
Samma Steele Dossier som vi nu vet om att Clintonkampanjen betalade för och som vars författare Christoffer Steele (Brittisk f.d. agent, där har man den riktiga utländska inblandningen i det amerikanska valet) nu har erkänt i domstol att den togs fram för att användas mot Trump.