Dags att sluta mörklägga debatt kring Förintelsen

Samma som vanligt: Det är givetvis trist om det stämmer.

Det är ytterligare en "skrift" som skrivits under pseudonym och under falsk akademisk titel. Denna person - Thomas Dalton, Ph.D - existerar inte.[…] Det är ytterligare ett exempel på akademisk ohederlighet.
https://www.flashback.org/showpost....1&postcount=48

Ursprungligen postat av Xploit
[…]man skulle mycket väl kunna bedriva studier där man kan anonymt säga var man står i fråga.[…]

https://www.flashback.org/showpost....3&postcount=46

Ursprungligen postat av boba fett
Å andra sidan så vet vi ingenting om hur många inom det vetenskapliga samfundet, eller i det övriga samhället, som skulle öppet ifrågasätta det hela om det faktiskt var socialt accepterat, och i vissa fall lagligt, att göra så.
https://www.flashback.org/showpost....0&postcount=22

Q. I suggest, also, that you falsified to some extent as well, because throughout the book you referred to someone by the name of Rudolf Vrba, and you attribute the name Vrba to the conversations, and Rudi, meaning you, and in fact, there was nobody by that name in the camp, sir. Is that right?
A. That is perfectly so, but I would take a great objection against your word "falsify", because I would say, then, that the artist drawn my moustache in a different way has falsified something. This is not a document, but literature, and literature has been meant mainly for young people and it would be for young people a considerable confusion to explain to them all the methods of clandestine work and how it came that the names have to be changed.
Moreover, I would have to explain my real ground and reasons why I changed my German name to the name of my native language, and this would have transferred, perhaps, a national hatred to the reader, which I wanted to avoid, against the Germans.
In other words, I used my licence of
p. 1448
a poet, it is called licensia poetarium, to put in the book only those facts and events which will enable a young person to understand the general situation.
http://www.mailstar.net/holocaust-debate22.html

[…]I would take a great objection against your word "falsify", because I would say, then, that the artist drawn my moustache in a different way has falsified something.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).

[...]det är texten och sakfrågorna som är intressanta - inte diverse påhittade titlar och pseudonymer, inte om författaren diggar urinterapi (Adelskogh).
Debatten handlar inte om det.

START:


Says who, Professor Dalton?

This also leads us back to the question where Professor Dalton obtained his PhD and at what "prominent American university" he has been teaching humanities "for several years now".

Would you please enlighten us, Professor Dalton?
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-daltons.html

Ursprungligen postat av blackie_lawless

bolt

Death matrix? Vad har du att säga om saken? För jag utgår från att du har läst boken...
https://www.flashback.org/showpost....0&postcount=58

To deal with this, Dalton introduces a remarkable (and easy!) analytic tool which he calls the death matrix, a technique that combines various tables into a single analytic field that clearly demonstrates the properties of any account of the six alleged extermination camps. It can be done by anybody who has a spreadsheet option on their computer. Not unique to Dalton, it's a common tool in several technical fields, and you have to wonder why anti-revisionist John Zimmerman, who is a professor of accounting and has to use similar tools in transaction analysis, never used it in his various refutations.
It's a terrific tool, something that becomes clear when the tables reveal that the combined work of exhumations and cremations at Belzec had no choice but to run at a rate of 92,000 per month. That's better than 3,000 per day, 125 per hour, a corpse dug out of the ground and thawed and burned to fragments and ground to powder every 30 seconds; and on wooden pyres in the dead of a Polish winter when weather conditions would have frozen the ground rock-solid and rendered many days impossible for work. That account is ridiculous; whatever the truth is, it's something else. Why didn't somebody think of this technique before?
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-daltons.html