2012-02-11, 20:55
  #1909
Medlem
Svithjods avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Knutte_Ninja
Ska de inte flyga modifierade embaer, textron eller pilatus för att banka talibaner är det tänkt?
Snarare blir det drönare i olika former som kommer sköta CAS.
Citera
2012-02-12, 00:22
  #1910
Medlem
Det var ju diskussioner om att bygga en ny version på OV-10 broncon, detta kan ju komma oavsett budgetnedskärningarna eftersom denna skulle kunna säljas till många utländska aktörer. Även om det nu naturligtvis är mindre chanser om det inte kommer ett kontrakt från US goverment.

För de flesta typerna av konfliktsituationer man har sett i iraq/afghanistan skulle tom en bronco troligtvis ha gjort större nytta än A-10c. Men vi får väl se vad analysen säger
Citera
2012-02-12, 03:40
  #1911
Medlem
Knutte_Ninjas avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Svithjod
Snarare blir det drönare i olika former som kommer sköta CAS.

Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av scheele
Det var ju diskussioner om att bygga en ny version på OV-10 broncon, detta kan ju komma oavsett budgetnedskärningarna eftersom denna skulle kunna säljas till många utländska aktörer. Även om det nu naturligtvis är mindre chanser om det inte kommer ett kontrakt från US goverment.

För de flesta typerna av konfliktsituationer man har sett i iraq/afghanistan skulle tom en bronco troligtvis ha gjort större nytta än A-10c. Men vi får väl se vad analysen säger

Såg på något flygprogram på youtube att de jobbade med ett propellerplan för insurgencyfighting (eller någon annan käck term typ COIN). Det verkar som att - nu litar vi på wiki så ta det för vad det är - a29 embraer super tucano som ska fylla den rollen och Broncon är en no-go http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer_EMB_314_Super_Tucano
Citera
2012-02-14, 20:17
  #1912
Medlem
En intressant artikel från dagens Aftenposten.
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/Lockheed-Martin-bekrefter-at-F-35-blir-dyrere--6761980.html
Lite tillspetsat, så går det att dra följande två slutsatser av artikeln:
Det blir ett dyrare stycketpris på F-35, men ingen köpare skall behöva betala det högre priset.
Skriv på kontraktet, så bestämmer vi det slutliga priset två år senare.
Citera
2012-02-15, 20:24
  #1913
Medlem
Italien kapar sin beställning av F-35 med 41st ~30% från tidigare 131st ner till 90st.

Citat:
-- Italy will reduce its planned order of Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35 fighter jets and trim the size of the military as part of defense-spending cuts, Defense Minister Giampaolo Di Paola said.

Italy will purchase 90 F-35s rather than the originally planned 131, Di Paola said in Rome in testimony before a joint defense committee of both houses of Parliament today.


Källa
Citera
2012-02-18, 13:30
  #1914
Medlem
Pentagon, Lockheed see price of F-35 going up
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/14/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSTRE81D1JG20120214

Citat:
(Reuters) - Delays in U.S. and international orders for Lockheed Martin Corp's (LMT.N) new F-35 fighter jet will increase its total cost, Lockheed and U.S. officials said on Tuesday, as Italy announced a cut in spending on the warplane.

On Monday, the Pentagon confirmed plans to put off orders for 179 F-35s over the next five years to save $15.1 billion and allow more time for testing, a third restructuring in recent years.

U.S. officials insist they have not changed their plans to develop and buy 2,443 jets at a cost of $382 billion over the next few decades.
Citera
2012-02-18, 13:32
  #1915
Medlem
Canada appears to waver on F-35 purchase
http://news.yahoo.com/canada-appears-waver-f-35-purchase-220709526.html

Citat:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper on Tuesday opened the door for a possible cut in the number of F-35 fighter jets Canada will buy, after reports that the United States was scaling back its purchase plans.

"There's a budget for that and the government has been clear, we will operate within that budget," Harper said in parliament about the project.
Citera
2012-02-18, 13:35
  #1916
Medlem
U.S. sees "manageable risk" in F-35 restructuring
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/13/us-usa-budget-lockheed-fighter-idUSTRE81C1RB20120213

Citat:
(Reuters) - The Pentagon on Monday confirmed plans to postpone production of 179 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters built by Lockheed Martin Corp over the next five years to save $15.1 billion, but it said the risk was "manageable."

The U.S. defense budget for fiscal 2013 funds 13 fewer airplanes than initially planned, saving $1.6 billion on the multinational, radar-evading fighter plane, the Pentagon's biggest weapons program.

Citat:
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in January, a year ahead of schedule, lifted a two-year "probation" on the Marine Corps B-model of the plane, which can land like a helicopter He said the jet's technical issues were on their way to being resolved.
Citera
2012-02-18, 13:41
  #1917
Medlem
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Management Was "Acquisition Malpractice" DoD Says
http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/aerospace/aviation/f35-joint-strike-fighter-program-management-was-acquisition-malpractice-dod-says

Citat:
Last week, Frank Kendall, the Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics who was recently nominated by President Obama to permanently take over the position, said in a speech (pdf) at the Center for Strategic & International Studies that the procurement strategy for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program was an example of "acquisition malpractice." Back in December, Vice Admiral David Venlet, the current F-35 program executive officer, characterized the strategy as merely a "miscalculation."

Citat:
"Putting the F35 into production years before the first test flight was acquisition malpractice. It should not have been done... But we did it."

Citat:
Referring to the F-35, Kendall said that there were "optimistic predictions" at the start of production. In other words, it had been assumed that there were "good enough design tools and good enough simulations and modeling that we wouldn't have to worry about finding problems in test," he said. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, this optimism—which the program's leadership held to despite warnings from the GAO (pdf) and others (pdf)—proved to be unfounded.

Kendall reports that the DoD is "finding problems with all three F-35 variants that are the types of things that [you're always going to find] in a state-of-the-art, next-generation, fighter aircraft ." In other words, issues such as design flaws in wings and the tail hook, improperly packed parachutes, and lower than expected combat acceleration, have cropped up.
Citera
2012-02-18, 13:52
  #1918
Medlem
Via denna här bloggposten

F-35A er en bastard-løsning!
http://www.dagsavisen.no/nyemeninger/alle_meninger/cat1003/subcat1038/thread241420/#post_241420

Så hittade jag följande text


U.S. Navy and U.K. Royal Navy F-35 unable to get aboard ship
http://www.f-16.net/news_article4494.html

Citat:
An industry expert who is a graduate Flight Test Engineer (FTE) of the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School (USNTPS), Peter Goon, stated that, "Given the limited amount of suitable structure at the back end of the JSF variants, due primarily to the commonality that was being sought between the three variant designs and the fact that the STOVL F-35B JSF is the baseline design, there was always going to be high risk associated with meeting the carrier suitability requirements."

__________________
Senast redigerad av mrpreben 2012-02-18 kl. 13:59.
Citera
2012-02-22, 13:28
  #1919
Medlem
Dr.Spins avatar
Verkar som om jag hinner för MrPreben 4 once...
http://www.svd.se/naringsliv/stridsflygtillverkare-forlorade-miljoner_6871345.svd

Mer info samt vettiga relaterade artiklar:
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre81l080-us-lockheed-fighter/

Ungefär en summering av sådant som redan konstaterats.
Citera
2012-02-29, 18:53
  #1920
Medlem
Japan says may cancel Lockheed F-35 if price rises
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/29/lockheed-fighter-japan-idUSL4E8DT5XN20120229

Citat:
Feb 29 (Reuters) - Japan may cancel orders for Lockheed Martin Corp's F-35 fighter jets if the price rises or deliveries are delayed, Defense Minister Naoki Tanaka said on Wednesday, casting doubt on Tokyo's choice of next-generation combat aircraft.

Tokyo has warned Washington against increasing the price, but this was the first time Tanaka publicly raised the possibility of cancelling the order.
Citera

Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera

Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera

Skapa ett konto

Det är enkelt att registrera ett nytt konto

Bli medlem

Logga in

Har du redan ett konto? Logga in här

Logga in