http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=5
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl.../01/24/1842218
Citat:
I used to be a KDE user. I thought KDE 4.0 was such a disaster I switched to GNOME. I hate the fact that my right button doesn't do what I want it to do. But the whole "break everything" model is painful for users and they can choose to use something else.
I realise the reason for the 4.0 release, but I think they did it badly. They did so may changes it was a half-baked release. It may turn out to be the right decision in the end and I will re-try KDE, but I suspect I'm not the only person they lost.
I got the update through Fedora and there was a mismatch from KDE 3 to KDE 4.0. The desktop was not as functional and it was just a bad experience for me. I'll revisit it when I reinstall the next machine which tends to be every six to eight months.
Jag håller med helt. KDE 3.5 var helt ok och jag avskydde Gnome just eftersom Gnome var så väldigt neddummat. Sen vid uppgraderingen till KDE4.0 och senare 4.1 blev det bara för mycket.
Nu tycker jag Gnome i Ubuntu fungerar riktigt bra med tabbar i Nautilus, gnome-network-manager, Bluetooth osv.
Bluetooth och smidigheten i Konqueror vid filhanteringen var det som bl a höll mig kvar på KDE men nu är detta rätt bra under Gnome.