__________________
Senast redigerad av eyecreate 2020-01-28 kl. 19:55.
Senast redigerad av eyecreate 2020-01-28 kl. 19:55.
Many aspects of Gerstein's testimony are unquestionably problematic. [In making] statements, such as the height of the piles of shoes and clothing at Belzec and Treblinka, Gerstein himself is clearly the source of exaggeration. Gerstein also added grossly exaggerated claims about matters to which he was not an eyewitness, such as that a total of 25 million Jews and others were gassed.
Bevisbördan är i själva verket den omvända.Jo men problemet är att revisionister avfärdar allt som talar emot dem. Det inkluderar varje ögonvittnesskildring och expertutlåtande och varje historiker. Det är lite magstarkt att kräva ytterligare bevis. Vad för slags bevis vill du ha, om du avfärdar alla bevis?
Det här skulle i så fall motbevisa det vanliga revisionsnacket om att gasning hittades på efter kriget. Men ni tror ju inte på något av det som motbevisar er ändå.
But in the essential issue, namely that he was in Belzec and witnessed the gassing of a transport of Jews from Lwow, his testimony is fully corroborated by Pfannenstiel. It is also corroborated by other categories of witnesses from Belzec.
Professor Pfannenstiel testified in court several times that while Gerstein's testimony is incorrect on many counts, they did visit Belzec together and witnessed a gassing.
Gerstein even managed to pass the information about the gassing to his contact in the Dutch resistance, J. H. Ubbink. Ubbink relayed information to Cornelis van der Hooft, who wrote it down in 1943.
SPIEGEL: What was going through your mind when you were standing with the surveyors in the gas chamber?Vad skulle han tjäna på att ljuga?
W.: You can imagine it must have been a big room. It was pretty much a concrete bunker. There were pipes on the outside; I don't know any more if there were four or six. Then they threw a can inside.
SPIEGEL: You saw SS troops throwing Zyklon B in from the outside?
W.: Yes, of course. Standing on the tower, you could see them coming. It was always a vehicle with two men inside. And then they drove directly there and did a little operation and then you knew: That is the death squad.
https://www.spiegel.de/international...-a-988127.html
What did you think when you found out that Jews were being gassed in Auschwitz?Du hänvisar till Hans Aumeier som avrättades 1948 och knappast hade anledning att vara ärlig med sitt deltagande. Kan du hänvisa till någon annan som levde lite längre och inte hade något självintresse i att förneka vad de såg i Auschwitz?
"That it was a tool of waging war. A war with advanced methods."
What did you feel when the Jews were taken to the gas chamber?
"Nothing, I have to say. Because the horrific wasn't obvious. When you know that killing is going on, you also know that people are dying. The horrors only dawned on me when I heard the screams."
https://www.spiegel.de/international...-a-355188.html
Bevisbördan är i själva verket den omvända.Jo men problemet är att revisionister avfärdar allt som talar emot dem. Det inkluderar varje ögonvittnesskildring och expertutlåtande och varje historiker. Det är lite magstarkt att kräva ytterligare bevis. Vad för slags bevis vill du ha, om du avfärdar alla bevis?
Det här skulle i så fall motbevisa det vanliga revisionsnacket om att gasning hittades på efter kriget. Men ni tror ju inte på något av det som motbevisar er ändå.
But in the essential issue, namely that he was in Belzec and witnessed the gassing of a transport of Jews from Lwow, his testimony is fully corroborated by Pfannenstiel. It is also corroborated by other categories of witnesses from Belzec.
Professor Pfannenstiel testified in court several times that while Gerstein's testimony is incorrect on many counts, they did visit Belzec together and witnessed a gassing.
Gerstein even managed to pass the information about the gassing to his contact in the Dutch resistance, J. H. Ubbink. Ubbink relayed information to Cornelis van der Hooft, who wrote it down in 1943.
SPIEGEL: What was going through your mind when you were standing with the surveyors in the gas chamber?Vad skulle han tjäna på att ljuga?
W.: You can imagine it must have been a big room. It was pretty much a concrete bunker. There were pipes on the outside; I don't know any more if there were four or six. Then they threw a can inside.
SPIEGEL: You saw SS troops throwing Zyklon B in from the outside?
W.: Yes, of course. Standing on the tower, you could see them coming. It was always a vehicle with two men inside. And then they drove directly there and did a little operation and then you knew: That is the death squad.
https://www.spiegel.de/international...-a-988127.html
What did you think when you found out that Jews were being gassed in Auschwitz?Du hänvisar till Hans Aumeier som avrättades 1948 och knappast hade anledning att vara ärlig med sitt deltagande. Kan du hänvisa till någon annan som levde lite längre och inte hade något självintresse i att förneka vad de såg i Auschwitz?
"That it was a tool of waging war. A war with advanced methods."
What did you feel when the Jews were taken to the gas chamber?
"Nothing, I have to say. Because the horrific wasn't obvious. When you know that killing is going on, you also know that people are dying. The horrors only dawned on me when I heard the screams."
https://www.spiegel.de/international...-a-355188.html
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
Flashback finansieras genom donationer från våra medlemmar och besökare. Det är med hjälp av dig vi kan fortsätta erbjuda en fri samhällsdebatt. Tack för ditt stöd!
Swish: 123 536 99 96 Bankgiro: 211-4106