Citat:
Förutom att den faktiska informationen krossar dig Iradeorumongot. Du har dock inte kunnat bemöta den utan enbart kommit mid dina naziloida plebejfantasier som alltid. Tex den faktiska informationen som bevisar Spenglers kapitalism och nazisternas socialism som krossar dina efterblivna nazifantasier. Du vet, texterna om som bevisade att Spenglers kapitalism stod i motsatts till nazisternas socialism. Gillar du att se dina underlägsna kognitiva förmågor krossas, Iradeorumongot? 
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"According to some recent critics such as Ishay Landa, "Prussian socialism" has some decidedly capitalistic traits.[41] Spengler declares himself resolutely opposed to labor strikes (Spengler describes them as "the unsocialistic earmark of Marxism"), trade unions ("wage-Bolshevism" in Spengler's terms), progressive taxation or any imposition of taxes on the rich ("dry Bolshevism"), any shortening of the working day (he argues that workers should work even on Sundays), as well as any form of government insurance for sickness, old age, accidents, or unemployment.[41]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler
The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.
How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.
"With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party. "
"Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:
Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices."
https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-they-were-socialists-how-nazis-waged-war-private-property
"If we look at the Nazi program, this isn’t quite what comes to mind. Its dominant theme is that the German people have to come together as a collective entity: the common good must be put before the individual good. Differences in class and wealth must be strictly subordinated to the good of the German people (Volk) as a whole. Points 10 and 11 of the program declare:"
"The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the whole for the benefit for the general good. We demand therefore: Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery."
https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/yes-nazis-were-socialists
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"According to some recent critics such as Ishay Landa, "Prussian socialism" has some decidedly capitalistic traits.[41] Spengler declares himself resolutely opposed to labor strikes (Spengler describes them as "the unsocialistic earmark of Marxism"), trade unions ("wage-Bolshevism" in Spengler's terms), progressive taxation or any imposition of taxes on the rich ("dry Bolshevism"), any shortening of the working day (he argues that workers should work even on Sundays), as well as any form of government insurance for sickness, old age, accidents, or unemployment.[41]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler
The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.
How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.
"With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party. "
"Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:
Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices."
https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-they-were-socialists-how-nazis-waged-war-private-property
"If we look at the Nazi program, this isn’t quite what comes to mind. Its dominant theme is that the German people have to come together as a collective entity: the common good must be put before the individual good. Differences in class and wealth must be strictly subordinated to the good of the German people (Volk) as a whole. Points 10 and 11 of the program declare:"
"The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the whole for the benefit for the general good. We demand therefore: Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery."
https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/yes-nazis-were-socialists
Jag börjar tro att du verkligen gillar att bli förnedrad, Pzykoplutten. Någon annan förklaring finns inte. Varför refererar du annars till Ishay Landa som beskriver NS som hyperkapitalistisk? Gå och varva ned med handtrallor nu istället så inte alla finnarna i ditt ansikte spricker av upphetsning.
”No, obviously they weren’t socialist. It’s true that the Nazis occasionally used the term affirmatively. Some people cynically latch onto that as evidence: “They were socialists because they called themselves socialists!” But they were strongly anti-socialist in any real sense of the term.”
-Ishay Landa
https://jacobin.com/2022/08/nazi-germany-national-socialism-hypercaptialism-social-darwinism-liberalism
Citat:
Det är väldigt underhållande att sig dig konstant förnedras Iradeorumongot. För det är ju det enda som händer. Varför vågar du inte ta upp att den faktiska informationen bevisar Spenglers kapitalism och Hitlers socialism. Ta det lugnt med farsans tjack och sperma nu även om det kanske hjälper dig jobba ner din smällfeta ölmage. Fast då blir det nog ingen mer biltemakorv för socialbidragen heller.
Kanske du ska ta och bränna ihjäl dig på lite napalm i Dresden så blir samhället renare.
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"According to some recent critics such as Ishay Landa, "Prussian socialism" has some decidedly capitalistic traits.[41] Spengler declares himself resolutely opposed to labor strikes (Spengler describes them as "the unsocialistic earmark of Marxism"), trade unions ("wage-Bolshevism" in Spengler's terms), progressive taxation or any imposition of taxes on the rich ("dry Bolshevism"), any shortening of the working day (he argues that workers should work even on Sundays), as well as any form of government insurance for sickness, old age, accidents, or unemployment.[41]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler
"The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.
How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.
"With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party. "
"Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:
Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices."
https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-they-were-socialists-how-nazis-waged-war-private-property
"If we look at the Nazi program, this isn’t quite what comes to mind. Its dominant theme is that the German people have to come together as a collective entity: the common good must be put before the individual good. Differences in class and wealth must be strictly subordinated to the good of the German people (Volk) as a whole. Points 10 and 11 of the program declare:"
"The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the whole for the benefit for the general good. We demand therefore: Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery."
https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/yes-nazis-were-socialists
Kanske du ska ta och bränna ihjäl dig på lite napalm i Dresden så blir samhället renare.
"In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]"
"According to some recent critics such as Ishay Landa, "Prussian socialism" has some decidedly capitalistic traits.[41] Spengler declares himself resolutely opposed to labor strikes (Spengler describes them as "the unsocialistic earmark of Marxism"), trade unions ("wage-Bolshevism" in Spengler's terms), progressive taxation or any imposition of taxes on the rich ("dry Bolshevism"), any shortening of the working day (he argues that workers should work even on Sundays), as well as any form of government insurance for sickness, old age, accidents, or unemployment.[41]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler
"The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.
How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.
"With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party. "
"Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:
Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices."
https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-they-were-socialists-how-nazis-waged-war-private-property
"If we look at the Nazi program, this isn’t quite what comes to mind. Its dominant theme is that the German people have to come together as a collective entity: the common good must be put before the individual good. Differences in class and wealth must be strictly subordinated to the good of the German people (Volk) as a whole. Points 10 and 11 of the program declare:"
"The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the whole for the benefit for the general good. We demand therefore: Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery."
https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/yes-nazis-were-socialists
Det är nästan lite synd om dig, Pzykoplutten. Men bara nästan. Du spammar samma inlägg gång på gång och hänvisar till Ishay Landa. Du måste sakna allt vad självinsikt heter. För Ishay Landa har alltså betecknat både Spengler och NS som kapitalistiska.
Citat:
Haha, behövdes inte under fribankseran i Skottland. Som socialist fattar du verkligen inte vad en privat marknadsekonomi är. Där uppfinner privata krafter sina egna lösningar. Detta hatar alla socialister. Socialister är för varje form av planekonomi. Din Dunning-Kruger är verkligen grav. Det är äkta flashbackhumor att en knallkork som du påstår dig veta mer om bankverksamhet än Rothbard. Men det var alltså inte bara Rothbard utan Von Mises och hans lärjungar generellt som totalsågade FRB. Helt riktigt påpekade de att FRB bara kan existera tillsammans med en statlig CB som ”lender of last resort”.
Citat:
Visa då dessa "högersocialisters" partiprogram så kommer du förmodligen få en isärplockning som påminner starkt om den som jag gjorde för NMR:s socialistiska partiprogram som är mer vänster än både MP och V.
__________________
Senast redigerad av jnilsson 2024-07-20 kl. 01:24.
Senast redigerad av jnilsson 2024-07-20 kl. 01:24.
Citat:
Haha, Rudolf Kjellén med löntagarfonderna, var alltså en "högerman".En aktiv konfiskering av näringslivet och överföring av ägandet till fackföreningar var alltså "högerpolitik".
Detta kallade överklassarslet Palme för "ekonomisk demokrati". Om två grannar röstar för att överta tredje grannens bil så råder full demokrati...
Men nu vet vi att avskaffande av kapitalismen är "högerpolitik".
__________________
Senast redigerad av jnilsson 2024-07-20 kl. 00:59.
Senast redigerad av jnilsson 2024-07-20 kl. 00:59.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera