Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Stone
Jag vill inte tro på att en regeringen orkestrerar en sådan förödelse för att vinna folkets förtroende för ett krig i Irak (och nu mot Iran).
Om kaparna är påhittade för att kunna starta krig med Iran och Irak, skulle det inte vara smartare att ge dom Iranska eller Irakiska identiteter istället för Saudiska?
Roligt påstående att det inte finns bevis mot Usama.
Vad har du hittat i konspirationsteorin som inte innehåller sönderklippta och editerade kommentarer.
Sten.b
Rolig sida du har där. Speciellt delen där "fotoexperten" visar på att många bilder från pentagon är photoshopade.
Ska vi lägga till fotograferna på listan över folk som ljuger för att rädda Bush från gaskammaren?
har du tittat på bilderna och hans bevis för förfalskning.
Några av dessa vitnen borde ju rimligtvis ljuga även dom.
Från denna sida
och här är vad dom sagt.
ord för ord
The amount of eye witnesses I gathered who stated they saw an object crash into the Pentagon. The vast majority of the still available ones. about 89
The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.*** at least 45
Citat:
*** This way you can get a good indication if they saw a large or a small plane. If someone just said: "I saw the plane and I saw it crash", it is not counted, even though chances are 99,9999% they were talking about a 757-223, also known as flight 77
The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases there's no indication the witnesses were talking about a small jet. at least 25
The amount of witnesses who reported the noise of the plane was very loud to deafening. at least 22
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a plane running down light poles when crossing the the highways. at least 19
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw and heard the plane went full throttle only at the last seconds. at least 12
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a C-130H flying 30 seconds behind a jetliner. at least 11
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw the plane had its gear up. at least 6
The amount of eye witnesses who stated the plane had it's flaps up (not deployed). Witness 1 saw a 757, witness 2 and 4 both saw an American Airlines, witness 3 saw an American Airlines 757. No known witnesses stated the opposite. at least 4
The amount of eye witnesses who stated that they saw a small corporate jet, without doing any creative interpretating of the witness accounts. at least 2
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a missile. What the person thought he heard isn't relevant! at least 0
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a military jet fighter at the time of the crash. at least 0
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a Global Hawk at the time of the crash. at least 0
The amount of witnesses who reported the plane was pretty quiet. (One of them acknowledged it was the shock. Another one saw it was an American Airlines jet, saw it had its gears up and saw light poles being knocked down. Others were in their cars, all windows up and the radio on) at least 4
The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw the plane had its gear down. (Indirect, said a wheel hit a pole) at least 1
The amount of witnesses who have said something that might point to the use of explosives or incendiaries. Update: This has all been explained to my satisfaction by General Benton K. Partin. You can read what he had to say about this in part 11 of this article. I only wonder about the two witnesses who said they smelled cordite, but that's about it. at least 25
och här är General Benton K. Partins förklaring till det senare.
Citat:
"When you slam an aluminum aircraft at high velocity into a concrete structure, it's going to do exactly what we saw happen at the Pentagon on 9/11," Partin said. "If you look at a frontal mass cross-section of the plane, you see a cylinder of aluminum skin with stringers. When it impacts with the exterior [Pentagon] wall at 700-800 feet per second, much of the kinetic energy of the plane converts to thermal energy, and much of the aluminum converts to vapor, burning to aluminum oxide. That's why on the still photos from Pentagon surveillance camera, you first see the frame with that brilliant white luminescent flash just before the frame of the orange fireball, the jet fuel burning. The aluminum cylinder — the plane fuselage — is acting like a shaped charge penetrating a steel plate. It keeps penetrating until it is consumed. The Boeing 757 is over 150 feet long, so it's going to penetrate quite a ways before it's spent. The wings have a much lower mass cross-section and are loaded with fuel besides, so there is little left of them except small bits and pieces."
Varför kan vi inte ha olika underforum i 911-tråden det hoppas fram och tillbaka mellan wtc-pentagon hela tiden.
