Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
chimpsky666
Var finns informationen?
Låter troligt med tanke på ständiga US-förluster på sistone.
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
SU-35
Mycket troligt isåfall. Nikki Haley och hennes kumpaner bl.a börjar bli väldigt otåliga nu när deras älskade rebeller dör som flugor. Det USA kommer göra nu är att desperat slänga alla medel för att avsätta Assad. När detta skiter sig, så är det slutet för imperiet USA. Kurderna kommer förhoppningsvis vända ryggen åt denna orm nu efter Afrin. Skiter man i Manbij så har USA garanterat förlorat i Syrien. Detta är deras sista desperata försök till att ha någon som helst makt i regionen. Efter detta återstår antingen att lämna Syrien, eller öppet stödja Jihadisterna med ursäkten att dessa inte är jihadister utan helt vanliga rebeller, och att allt som vi har sett bara är rysk trollfabrik
Vår Zionistiska expertpanel kommer självklart tro USA om detta händer.
En som påstår sig ha ryska källor:
Military Advisor
@miladvisor
Citat:
Russia’s MoD: We have reliable information at our disposal that US instructors have trained a number of militant groups in the vicinity of the town of At-Tanf, to stage provocations involving chemical warfare agents in southern Syria
Citat:
Russia’s MoD: The provocations will be used as a pretext by the US and its allies to launch strikes on military and government infrastructure in Syria.
Citat:
Russia’s MoD: We’re registering the signs of the preparations for the possible strikes. Strike groups of the cruise missile carriers have been formed in the east of the Mediterranean Sea, Persian Gulf and Red Sea.
https://twitter.com/miladvisor/status/975015170094313472
Ett lite mer balanserat resonemang kring detta här:
EHSANI2
@EHSANI22
55 minför 55 minuter sedan
Citat:
There has been increased chatter both inside Opp circles and in Damascus about the possibility of an imminent strike by the U.S on #Syria. It seems that this chatter has been building on the back of private and even public warnings by Russian officials ==>
Citat:
2-Rather curiously, such expectations of a U.S strike seem more pronounced in “Syrian” circles than in Washington or in US chatter. At first glance, it appears that if a strike were to occur it would be in retaliation to the Syrian Army move in #Ghouta . But this is unlikely =>
Citat:
3-While Washington May indeed be unhappy about the #Ghouta military operations and now that civilians are leaving, it would make a Ghouta-related US military strike rather unlikely. Instead of Ghouta, any rationale for US strike has to come from those dreaded “Iranian Corridors”
Citat:
4-When it comes to Iran, it has been interesting to observe the negative correlation between actions on the ground and the actual chatter both in the media and by officials. As Iran’s presence has been subsiding, the fervor and near panic about Iran’s role in Syria has increased
Citat:
5-If Iran was indeed going to be allowed to establish military bases, ports or missile factories as claimed, one ought to have been seeing the “Trend” of Iranian presence in Syria on a steep upward trajectory as Tehran steadily moves forward to achieve such goals. This is not so
Citat:
6-Seen as a “Trend”, peak of Iran’s presence is now behind us and is not now or ahead of us. One can perhaps point to this peak during the Aleppo military operations. Since then, any “empirical, objective & facts-based” analysis confirms the trend’s downward & not upward slope
Citat:
7-When it comes to Iran’s role in Syria, the passion and panic that this subject generates can’t be dismissed with only discussing or pointing to the “current facts on the ground”. Israel (& US officials) seem convinced that what is important is “Iranian Intent & future plans”
Citat:
8-When it comes to Iran’s “intent”, it is argued that the Syrian Leadership is simply too weak to push back and prevent Iran from building a Tehran/Beirut land corridor and a footprint on the Golan that would effectively turn Syria into another Hizbollah-led Lebanon
Citat:
9-This explains why most Western observers of Syria depict a Syrian Leadership with no independent decision making capability. If Iran wants to move forces to the Golan, it can. If it wanted to build a military base, port or missile factory, it can. Assad in effect has no say
Citat:
10-In truth and after a near-death experience, the last thing that the Syrian Leadership wants now is to give either Israel or the U.S the excuse to start a war on Syria. By extension, Damascus has to ensure that while Iran is an ally, it does not gain a footprint in the country
https://twitter.com/EHSANI22/status/975363368449081344
