Rättegången mot Anders Behring Breivik [Sammanfogade trådar]

If you take away the name Knights Templar and the regalia that Breivik used what do you have left?

Breivik a self professing militant Nationalist and a 1500 page manifesto that he claims was the sole purpose of his attack on Utoya island, which was to maximise its publicity.
A militant Nationalist is not a Christian fundamentalist and Knights Templar's are all Christian fundamentalists, meaning they have accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and personal Saviour and the fundamentals of the Christian message is what they are sworn to propagate and uphold.
So Breivik is dressed in clothes that do not belong to him which makes him a wolf in sheeps clothing but it served a purpose.
Why is Breivik dressed in clothes that do not belong to him?
The clothes along with certain intelligent pointers within the manifesto along with claims of more cells ready to strike worked very well in framing me as being the English 'mentor' he speaks of in the manifesto.
If I was his alleged English 'mentor' he speaks of then why would he single me out for arrest the day after his attacks?
If I was his English 'mentor' then that was not a very nice thing to do to me was it?
Even the simplest can understand that point.
The clothes detract from the real reason behind his attacks which is the manifesto and I am not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere, with nothing I have ever written inside it's pages.
His life long work that he sacrificed his life for (the manifesto) contains the writings of people I detest with there being a public record of this prior to July 22nd 2011.
So is it not a bit suspicious that most of the people he applauds within his manifesto as his heroes and ideological people to follow are the people I have had a long running public contention with yet I was the one who stood accused of being his English 'mentor' which could have turned out very badly for me?

Breivik was no friend of mine and his actions in apportioning blame up me show you that.

Terrorsakens mange kraftfelt
Får følger. En historisk rettssak går mot slutten. Nå ser vi noen av de endringene 22. juli-saken kan føre til.

Saken mot Anders Behring Breivik er en lyskaster rettet mot institusjoner, lovverk og etater. Et helt fagfelt, rettspsykiatrien, har fått en oppmerksomhet faget aldri har opplevd tidligere.
Presset vil få konsekvenser. Dette har vi fått klare holdepunkter for i lengre tid, forsterket av de siste dagers behandling av rettssakens store, underliggende tema: Om Breivik kan straffes eller ikke.
Rettspsykiaterne Synne Sørheim og Torgeir Husby fastholder sin konklusjon. Breivik har levd i et altomfattende vrangforestillingsunivers. Han er paranoid schizofren og psykotisk.
Men selv om deres sykdomsforståelse legges til grunn: Bør det være slik at Breivik ikke kan straffes? Når vi vet hva han var i stand til å planlegge og gjennomføre? Når vi har hørt hans forklaring om alt han forsto?

Har ikke Breivik det juristene kaller skyldevne - uansett hvilke merkelapper psykiaterne setter på hans mentale tilstand?