Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Stig-Britt
Jag har läst det nu och förstår inte riktigt vad du vill åt. Jag upplever att dash framstår som arrogant. Han använder FDR-medlemmarnas beteenden som ett argument mot Molyneux flera gånger om. Kan du inte försöka citera de bitar du tycker är anmärkningsvärda så att det finns något mer konkret att bemöta?
Här finns en hel del att gotta sig i:
http://www.fdrliberated.com/?p=3802
http://www.fdrliberated.com/?p=4753
http://www.fdrliberated.com/?p=5738
De tre påstådda stegen som Stefan gör gällande, när det gäller en "
konversion" till FDR och forumen där. Exempelvis:
Citat:
From Podcast #211 (Childhood Prisons):
28:50…Our childhoods—our collective childhoods were prisons. And I know I’m going to get even more emails about this…’Oh, I had a good relationship with my mom and dad.’ ‘Oh, they were fine.’ ‘They were this’ and ‘They were that’…
No. I’m sorry. I gotta tell you, and I hate to say it because I don’t mean to be a bully, but you’re wrong.
Det är väl mest det som de flesta vänder sig emot, hans påstådda hat mot familjen på grund av sin egen uppväxt. Att han bygger psykologiska profiler via en chatt med medlemmen dash, och de som har blivit bannlysta av honom på grund av att de ifrågasatt honom:
Citat:
Over time, I’ve documented…
How Molyneux appears to be distancing himself from his true beliefs that he once stated publicly and freely.
How his wife, who (1) claims to have been more responsible for the creation of FDR than Molyneux himself, (2) used to advertise and host “Ask-A-Therapist” podcasts on FDR, (3) used to be the go-to gal on matters related to defooing, has now mysteriously vanished from the “community” altogether along with all of her podcasts. And no explanation.
The incredible drama of Universally Preferable Behavior (UPB), from Molyneux’s bold promise in 2005 to “win the argument from morality,” to the tensions that the development process created within the FDR “community,” to the book’s release in 2007, to the almost complete disinterest Molyneux’s masterpiece received from everyone outside of his community.
The ethical dilemma of following a leader who creates videos entitled “Integrity as Salvation,” but is not above misrepresenting Dr. Vincent J. Felitti’s A.C.E. Study as a study on child abuse as well as misrepresenting the work of Dr. Bruce Perry (after apparently using and modifying his materials without permission)—all to prove his own “Bomb in the Brain” theories. (All documented about mid-way down in this article).
The near-riot at FDR caused by two members who exposed the hopeless logic at the center of Real-Time Relationships (The Logic of Love).
Intressant sida där alla länkar och källor finns:
http://www.fdrliberated.com/
