Fan, man har ju massor med pengar över för att begära ut sånt här eftersom man inte åker privatjet hela dagarna.
Nu har jag druckit lite vatten så här kommer en 50-sidig stämningsansökan mot Olof där man kan läsa hur han och hans polare blåst ett gift par på en massa pengar. https://www.docdroid.net/NYvv3qB/17450046831-50-pdf
Rättegången fortsätter September 7, 2021, in department 68 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.
Status Conference Re: Bankruptcy
Nu har jag druckit lite vatten så här kommer en 50-sidig stämningsansökan mot Olof där man kan läsa hur han och hans polare blåst ett gift par på en massa pengar. https://www.docdroid.net/NYvv3qB/17450046831-50-pdf
Rättegången fortsätter September 7, 2021, in department 68 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.
Status Conference Re: Bankruptcy
Citat:
ROBERT FORBES, an individual; PATRICIA FORBES, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
SHOBERT VARTAN, an individual;
DANIEL DAVID REITBERG, an individual;
OLOF KYROS GUSTAFSSON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Defendants.
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
SHOBERT VARTAN, an individual;
DANIEL DAVID REITBERG, an individual;
OLOF KYROS GUSTAFSSON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Defendants.
Citat:
COMPLAINT FOR:
(1) DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF FIDCUCIARY DUTY
(2) FRAUD
(3) MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED
(4) RESTITUTION BASED ON UNJUST ENRICHMENT
(5) RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS COSE § 17200
(1) DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF FIDCUCIARY DUTY
(2) FRAUD
(3) MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED
(4) RESTITUTION BASED ON UNJUST ENRICHMENT
(5) RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS COSE § 17200
Citat:
3. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendant, SHOBERT VARTAN (hereinafter "Vartan") is, and at all times herein mentioned was, an individual residing and doing business in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. At all times herein mentioned Vartan held himself out to Plaintiffs as being a licensed real estate loan broker and/or agent under the laws of the State of California.
Citat:
5. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon alleges that defendant DANIEL REITBERG and OLOF KYROS GUSTAFSSON were former corporate officers of Adenheim, Inc., (hereinafter "Adenheim") is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located in Calabasas, County of Los Angeles State of California. Adenheim was dissolved on Jan 10, 2017. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and hereon allege that Adenheim is, and at all times herein mentioned was, engaged in the business of arranging and securing real property loans for costumers and that it is, and at all times herein mentioned was, duly licensed as a loan broker.
Citat:
7. SHOBERT VARTAN, DANIEL DAVID REITBERG, OLOF KYROS GUSTAFSSON were agents or conspirators with THE REO GROUP, INC.
Citat:
9. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege in or about October and early November 2016, Defendants, and each of them, entered into a conspiracy and agreement to do each of the acts hereinafter alleged, and that the acts hereinafter alleged were undertaken pursuant to, and in furtherance of, such conspiracy. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that the purpose and goal of such conspiracy was to induce consumers to enter into loan transactions which were unconscionable and did not favor the consumers, but which were solely intended to benefit Defendants, and each of them, including, through the use of false and misleading statements, unconscionable loan and broker agreements, and through the use of agreements which were the product of undue influence.
Citat:
11. In October 2016, Plaintiffs contacted Unicitizens and Vartan to inquire about refininancing an existing note secured by deed of trust with no more than 3.5% APR and with a cash out of $40,000.00. Plaintiffs, and each of them had excellent credit, and could have easily secured such a loan from a variety of lenders.
Citat:
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. For general and compensatory damages in a sum exceeding $50,000.00, more specifically according to proof;
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
2. For punitive and exemplary damages in a sum of $100,000.00.
3. For general and compensatory damages in a sum exceeding $50,000.00, more specifically according to proof;
THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION
4. For the sum of $37,000.00, plus interest thereon at the legal rate from January 2017.
FIFTH CAUSES OF ACTION
5. For permanent injunction restraining defendants, and each of them, from engaging in the unfair business practice acts alleged in the body.
1. For general and compensatory damages in a sum exceeding $50,000.00, more specifically according to proof;
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
2. For punitive and exemplary damages in a sum of $100,000.00.
3. For general and compensatory damages in a sum exceeding $50,000.00, more specifically according to proof;
THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION
4. For the sum of $37,000.00, plus interest thereon at the legal rate from January 2017.
FIFTH CAUSES OF ACTION
5. For permanent injunction restraining defendants, and each of them, from engaging in the unfair business practice acts alleged in the body.
