Citat:
Wikipedia är ingen källa. Det är en oseriös blogg som drivs av hamaskramande vänsteraktivister som hatar judar och sprider konspirationsteori och presenter deras politiska åsikter som belägg. Som exempel har argument kring hungersnöd visats att vara en konspirationsteori när man tittar på objektiva och seriösa källor:
Beläggen är redan länkade och citerar:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds
Plus målet som drivs i ICJ.
Vad sägs om att du kommer med dina belägg och källor som du och dina kollegor genomgående vägrar att posta?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds
Plus målet som drivs i ICJ.
Vad sägs om att du kommer med dina belägg och källor som du och dina kollegor genomgående vägrar att posta?
Citat:
UKLFI Charitable Trust page: “UKLFI Review Finds Reports of Famine in Gaza were Erroneous” (published 16 February 2025).
"Despite alarming projections, there has been no famine, as defined by IPC standards, in the Gaza Strip since October 2023. Acute malnutrition levels are only marginally higher than pre-war figures."
"Despite alarming projections, there has been no famine, as defined by IPC standards, in the Gaza Strip since October 2023. Acute malnutrition levels are only marginally higher than pre-war figures."
Citat:
FN och WHO håller med UNICEF att det inte finns hungersnöd i Gaza.
JNS analysis: “UNICEF data show there was no famine in Gaza” (29 October 2025) by Mike Wagenheim, citing the State of Palestine Nutrition Cluster /
“The newer information, released on Sept. 17 by the ‘State of Palestine’ Nutrition Cluster, reveals that IPC-standard age-weighted MUAC data—as opposed to the unweighted data in the IPC’s famine report—did not meet the IPC’s own famine criteria.”
“The Global Nutrition Cluster’s Sept. 17 data release… shows the age-weighted MUAC-focused mean malnutrition rate in the Gaza City area to be approximately 14.8% in the second half of July before falling substantially in August… That 14.8% measurement falls below the 15% necessary to meet famine criteria…”
According to Zlochin: the IPC’s determination was “based on fabricated data that misrepresented the raw, unweighted malnutrition statistics as if they were the properly age-weighted data required by IPC guidelines.”
“The newer information, released on Sept. 17 by the ‘State of Palestine’ Nutrition Cluster, reveals that IPC-standard age-weighted MUAC data—as opposed to the unweighted data in the IPC’s famine report—did not meet the IPC’s own famine criteria.”
“The Global Nutrition Cluster’s Sept. 17 data release… shows the age-weighted MUAC-focused mean malnutrition rate in the Gaza City area to be approximately 14.8% in the second half of July before falling substantially in August… That 14.8% measurement falls below the 15% necessary to meet famine criteria…”
According to Zlochin: the IPC’s determination was “based on fabricated data that misrepresented the raw, unweighted malnutrition statistics as if they were the properly age-weighted data required by IPC guidelines.”
Ett till exempel på hur din Wikipedia är ideologiskt präglad är tillexempel att dom påstår att "Over 1.9 million Palestinians—85% of Gaza's population—were forcibly displaced.[51] Israel's bombing" Men detta är bevisligen falskt. Befolkningen i Gaza är i princip oförändrad sen krigets början:
Citat:
Och denna källa kommer från hamasterroristerna själva, dom till och med använder ord som "martyrer" för att beskriva deras äckliga terrorister som dödats.
Innan kriget: 2.2 miljoner
Efter kriget: 2.13 miljoner
Källa:
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS)
Efter kriget: 2.13 miljoner
Källa:
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS)
Ett till exempel på att Wikipedia är ideologiskt präglad är tillexempel att dom har artiklar om "Gaza genocide" trots att det inte har bevisats i någon domstol, medans dom kallar Hamas invasion av Israel "Allegations of genocide in the October 7 attacks " när Hamas mål, ENLIGT HAMAS SJÄLVA, är att utrota alla judar:
Citat:
Att ett mål prövas av ICJ innebär inte att Israels ansvar är fastställt. Du misstolkar den rättsliga processen när du behandlar anklagelser som om de redan vore juridiskt bevisade.
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.
“Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps.”
“The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.” (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).
Källa: Hamas stadgedokument från 1988
“Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps.”
“The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.” (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).
Källa: Hamas stadgedokument från 1988
Wikipedia och den felaktiga UN kommissionen säger b.la. att "It encompasses mass killings, the targeted killing of children (who account for 30% of those killed),[19][20][21] deliberate starvation, infliction of serious bodily and mental harm, and prevention of births"
Problemet med Wikipedia och den här kommissionen är att de utgår från ett visst utfall och sedan försöker dra slutsatser om avsikten bakom det. Men om man i stället analyserar IDF:s metoder, snarare än att tillskriva ett givet utfall en specifik avsikt, framträder en helt annan bild:
Citat:
Without more facts, it is too early to say whether the IDF has complied with the obligation to warn in every case. However, there is no question that the IDF’s warnings practice, in general, is the gold standard. Indeed, as a matter of policy, the IDF typically exceeds what the law requires. It is likewise clear that its warning to evacuate northern Gaza constitutes an “effective warning,” as that concept is understood in IHL.
This is in sharp contrast to Hamas’s failure to provide any warnings to the civilian population of Gaza and its efforts to neutralize the effectiveness of the IDF’s. That Hamas has violated its own warning obligation under IHL is simply indisputable.
Källa: Lieber Institute West Point (Articles of War series)
This is in sharp contrast to Hamas’s failure to provide any warnings to the civilian population of Gaza and its efforts to neutralize the effectiveness of the IDF’s. That Hamas has violated its own warning obligation under IHL is simply indisputable.
Källa: Lieber Institute West Point (Articles of War series)
Citat:
Sen finns det en hel hög med experter inom området som håller med om att det inte förekommer folkmord. Tillexemepl John Spencer, Col. Richard Kemp, Eugene Kontorovich, David E. Bernstein, Menachem Rosensaft, Michal Cotler-Wunsh, Professor Malcolm Shaw, Brian Cox, osv, osv.
AI-summering:
Key conclusions: no evidence of a systematic policy of targeting or massacring civilians; no indication of deliberate/carpet bombing of civilians; protective measures were employed; many starvation figures rested on erroneous baseline data (e.g., pre-war truck averages).
Citat:
Finally, we feel compelled to express our deep concern about the widespread use of the term “genocide” by certain parties we have reviewed. Much like currency losing value through inflation when printed recklessly, certain terms lose their significance when used indiscriminately. If all high-intensity urban military conflicts in the future—despite significant efforts to protect civilian lives—are labeled as acts of genocide simply because of the immense human suffering they cause, the outcome will be fundamentally contrary to the objectives of international humanitarian law. Rather than deterring aggressors and preventing atrocities, the term “genocide” will lose its profound legal and emotional weight, becoming a political tool. In future crises, including those where deliberate, systematic efforts to annihilate a nation or group occur, the trivialization of genocide will serve as an excuse for future atrocities. As a result, international laws meant to protect vulnerable populations could be severely undermined, with grave consequences for all of humanity.
Källa: “Debunking the Genocide Allegations: A Reexamination of the Israel-Hamas War (2023-2025)” (Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies / BESA Center, 2025, ~300–330 pages)
Key conclusions: no evidence of a systematic policy of targeting or massacring civilians; no indication of deliberate/carpet bombing of civilians; protective measures were employed; many starvation figures rested on erroneous baseline data (e.g., pre-war truck averages).
Citat:
Finally, we feel compelled to express our deep concern about the widespread use of the term “genocide” by certain parties we have reviewed. Much like currency losing value through inflation when printed recklessly, certain terms lose their significance when used indiscriminately. If all high-intensity urban military conflicts in the future—despite significant efforts to protect civilian lives—are labeled as acts of genocide simply because of the immense human suffering they cause, the outcome will be fundamentally contrary to the objectives of international humanitarian law. Rather than deterring aggressors and preventing atrocities, the term “genocide” will lose its profound legal and emotional weight, becoming a political tool. In future crises, including those where deliberate, systematic efforts to annihilate a nation or group occur, the trivialization of genocide will serve as an excuse for future atrocities. As a result, international laws meant to protect vulnerable populations could be severely undermined, with grave consequences for all of humanity.
Källa: “Debunking the Genocide Allegations: A Reexamination of the Israel-Hamas War (2023-2025)” (Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies / BESA Center, 2025, ~300–330 pages)
Som exempel sågade Dr. Brian Cox sönder FN-kommissionens rapport under en debatt med Chris Sidoti, en av kommissionens ledare, förra veckan. Blev ganska pinsamt för Sidoti. Du kan läsa mer om det här: (FB) Statistiken över döda i Gazakriget motbevisar folkmordstesen
Sen har ytterligare 75 experter undertecknat ett öppet brev där de avvisar påståenden om att folkmord pågår i Gaza. Källa: https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/75-Military-Officials-Open-Letter-10.7.pdf
Men eftersom du är ett hjärntvättat får tror jag inte att du kommer att ta till dig den här informationen, utan istället fortsätta tro på hamaspropaganda som pumpas ut genom ljugmedia. I vilket fall som helst har jag krossat din lilla Wikipedia artikel, jag hoppas att du vaknar upp ur din vänsterpsykos.