Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Melange5738
Det här är inte en rättsvetare från den tiden, som jag efterfrågade. Du har ju verkligen problem med läsförståelse. Jag drev bara förut.
Citat:
Treaty expert David Hunter Miller, who was at the conference and subsequently compiled a 22 volume compendium of documents, provides a report of the Intelligence Section of the American Delegation to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 which recommended that "there be established a separate state in Palestine," and that "it will be the policy of the League of Nations to recognize Palestine as a Jewish state, as soon as it is a Jewish state in fact."
Här har du en expert på traktat (eller vad du kallar som "juridiskt bindande dokument") från 1919, och som var på mötet.
Därutöver står det inte stat, utan judisk hemland.
Citat:
The term "national home" was intentionally ambiguous,[163] having no legal value or precedent in international law,[156] such that its meaning was unclear when compared to other terms such as "state"
Citat:
The statement that such a homeland would be found "in Palestine" rather than "of Palestine" was also deliberate.
Du har alltså fel på alla punkter. Som jag tidigare skrev, dokumentet strider inte mot FN:s resolutioner 242 eftersom NF inte lovade hela Palestina till Israel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration