Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Menea
Ryssland är vägg i vägg med Nato .. Ryssland kom inte till Natos gränser … det var Nato som kom till Rysslands gränser.
Utan Nato hade vi aldrig haft de problemet vi har.
Post-World War II Geopolitical Climate
Citat:
The origins of NATO are deeply embedded in the geopolitical landscape that emerged immediately after World War II. With Europe economically devastated and politically fragmented, there was significant uncertainty regarding security and stability on the continent. The vacuum created by Germany's defeat quickly became a point of geopolitical tension, primarily driven by growing rivalry between the Soviet Union and Western democracies.
By 1946, the ideological divide between East and West had crystallized into a confrontation marked by mutual suspicion and competing security interests. Europe's weakened economies and fragmented political structures left countries vulnerable to external influence and internal instability. This precarious situation highlighted the urgent need for collective security mechanisms among Western states
Rising Tensions Between the USSR and Western Nations
Citat:
Following the war, Soviet forces consolidated control over Eastern Europe, installing communist regimes loyal to Moscow. This rapid expansion alarmed Western leaders, particularly given Joseph Stalin's reluctance to withdraw Soviet troops from occupied territories. Significant events heightened these tensions, such as the communist coup in Czechoslovakia in February 1948 and the subsequent Berlin Blockade initiated by the Soviets in June 1948. These actions demonstrated clear Soviet ambitions to expand their influence, fueling Western concerns about Europe's security.
European Economic and Military Insecurity Post-1945
Citat:
Europe faced enormous economic challenges after the war, amplified by military demobilization and reduced defense capabilities. Western European nations recognized their inability to counteract potential Soviet aggression individually, making collective defense an urgent priority. Simultaneously, economic initiatives such as the Marshall Plan (1947) aimed to stabilize and rebuild European economies, directly linking economic recovery to military security and political stability.
Brussels Treaty (1948): Precursor to NATO
Citat:
In response to escalating security concerns, Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom signed the Brussels Treaty on March 17, 1948. This agreement marked Europe's initial attempt at post-war collective defense. The treaty committed its signatories to mutual military assistance in case of aggression, aiming to counter Soviet threats through a unified front. Despite this regional commitment, the signatories quickly recognized that effective deterrence required broader international cooperation, particularly involving the United States.
North Atlantic Treaty (Washington Treaty) 1949
Citat:
Recognizing the limitations of purely European defense measures, Western nations initiated negotiations with the United States and Canada, culminating in the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty on April 4, 1949, in Washington, D.C. The initial signatories included Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
The treaty codified two core principles crucial to NATO’s future operations: collective defense and adherence to international law. Article 5 explicitly states that an armed attack against any member is considered an attack against all, obligating members to collective defense. This legal obligation was directly grounded in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, legitimizing NATO’s collective security framework within international law
https://www.diplomacyandlaw.com/post/understanding-nato-history-structure-and-global-role#:~:text=NATO%20emerged%20as%20a%20collective% 20 response%20to%20the,Alliance%E2%80%99s%20mandate%2 0and%20global%20role%20have%20continually%20evolve d.
Osanningar och rysk desinformation kommer du inte långt med här.
Ryssland startade kriget 2014, och den fullskaliga invasionen 2022. Så enkelt är det.
Ukraina hade inga som helst planer på att gå med i Nato innan 2014. Man va inte ens i närheten att kunna gå med då, inte nu eller inom en snar framtid heller.
Putin vet också att Nato inte skulle attackera Ryssland. Finns lixom inte i verkligheten att det skulle hända. Så detta argument är rent skitsnack/trams som inte är värt att diskutera.
