Här är, lite grovt, de skäl som domaren anger för att inte ge Musk ersättningen
#1
But Tesla had no grounds to flip the outcome of a court decision based on evidence it created after the trial took place, the opinion states.
#2
No court has ever allowed stockholder ratification after facts have been settled, with a sole exception during the past 70 years,
#3
She wrote that the stockholder vote by itself wasn’t enough to ratify a “conflicted-controller transaction,”
Det handlar om.att skydda mindre aktieägare.
#4
much of what Tesla told its stockholders in that proxy statement was either inaccurate or just plain misleading.
https://fortune.com/2024/12/03/the-4-fatal-flaws-in-tesla-bid-to-pay-elon-musk/
Men Tesla kommer att överklaga