Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Hew18
Baserat på...? Tillochmed forskarna tycker det är en bra ide.
Nja. Det finns risker med det också. Det är inte så enkelt.
https://online.ucpress.edu/elementa/article/10/1/00047/195026/Stratospheric-aerosol-injection-may-impact-global
Citat:
Prior research has determined that SAI will not only decrease global temperatures but is likely to have direct impacts on ecosystem and public health. This review seeks to investigate the various ways by which SAI may impact global public health outcomes related to hydrologic cycling, atmospheric chemical cycling, frequency of natural disasters, food system disruptions, and ecological health through the pathways of water, air, soil, and biota
Anthropogenically altering the global climate, through both the release of greenhouse gases or through climatic engineering, has unknown consequences, many of which will likely impact global health and quality of life. A more holistic approach is necessary to understand the relative benefits and harms in using SAI as compared to the implication of global climate change.
Citat:
The current impacts of climate change bring the possibility of many global public health challenges, such as natural disasters and heat waves, shifting ranges for disease vectors and changes in global agricultural production (Lobell and Field, 2007; Lafferty, 2009; Mitchell et al., 2016). Without GHG mitigation, these public health issues will occur regardless of SAI implementation, but deploying SAI may prevent some of the worst impacts.
Citat:
Conclusions
SAI has the potential to both help and harm public health and global ecosystems, and these consequences are still being evaluated. While mitigating the most severe consequences of global climate change, such as increased surface temperatures, SAI may introduce potential unknown consequences for public health outcomes that will need continued investigation. SAI has the potential to reduce the public health and ecosystem effects associated with temperature rise but may disrupt global environmental systems, potentially impacting water quality, agriculture, and zoonotic infection; however, continued unmitigated climate change will also bring about a variety of disruptions. There are many unknown or unintended consequences that may develop from fundamentally altering the global climate through SAI. While current models have predicted minimal negative impacts and highlight multiple positive impacts to improve public health and global ecology, there are many uncertainties surrounding SAI that remain. Geoengineering research has now reached a point at which some countries are beginning to develop national research programs (Temple, 2022). As research continues in this new era, it will be important to carry out more holistic modeling, including a focus on impacts, to continue to reduce the uncertainty surrounding the potential positive and negative consequences of SRM, especially those surrounding potential public health concerns.
Sådana här artiklar ser man rätt ofta. Alltså, inte som undersöker just effekterna som denna undersöker. Men hur de behandlar frågan om klimatförnändringen och orsakerna bakom den. Som en självklarhet. Lite som biologer ser på evolutionsteorin i den vetenskapliga litteraturen. Som en självklarhet som inte längre behöver motiveras utförligare.
Förnekarna i tråden står och stampar i forskning som är ett halvt sekel gammalt och låter inte sig själva att ta sig vidare.
Och detta är inte riktat mot dig Hew.
