Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Sanjati.
,
Albaner har aldrig nämts som en paleo-grupp. De nämns för första gången i historien för inte så länge sedan.
Du är tamefan en trögfattad jävel. Jag gav dig en språkvetenskaplig studie från Cambridge (2022) och en genetisk studie från University of California (2012). Språkvetenskapliga studier från de senaste hundratals åren fram till modern tid stödjer kopplingen mellan antika paleo-balkan språk och albanska. Svensken Hans Erich ThunMann var en av de första att bekräfta den kopplingen, om man nu vill gå så långt bak i tiden.
Från Cambridge:
Citat:
Nonetheless, it is argued that the overall evidence, based on the criterion of significant shared innovations, points to a particularly close connection between Albanian and Greek. It is further argued that this connection constitutes a subdivision within a discernible Palaeo-Balkanic subgroup that includes Messapic, Phrygian, and Armenian and possibly other fragmentarily known languages.
Citat:
As noted above, our ultimate assessment treats Albanian and Greek as particularly close relatives within Indo-European. We find the number of innovations shared only by Albanian and Greek to be overwhelming, thus pointing compellingly to a Helleno-Albanian subgroup.
Citat:
It connects Albanian even more to Greek than previously assumed.
Citat:
Ultimately, though, as indicated, the preponderance of evidence favours a close connection between Albanian and Greek,Footnote21 possibly as a subset within a “Palaeo-Balkanic” group with Armenian and Greek, as well as Phrygian, Messapic, and other fragmentarily attested languages (see Figure 13.1). The Albanian–Greek connection that we argue for here is particularly interesting in the light of the computational phylogenetic study of the interrelationships among IE languages reported on in Reference Chang, Cathcart, Hall and GarrettChang et al. 2015. In that paper, starting with the same model and data set as earlier phylogenetic studies (especially Bouckaert et al. 2012, 2013), but with a key difference in that they “constrained eight ancient and medieval languages to be ancestral to thirty-nine modern descendants” to allow for greater accuracy, the authors develop an “analysis with modern languages from all IE subfamilies” (Reference Chang, Cathcart, Hall and GarrettChang et al. 2015: 199–200) in which Albanian, represented by Arvanitika and Tosk,Footnote22 ends up in their resulting tree diagram of IE relationships as being most closely connected to Greek. Different methods and different IE data sets and different assumptions can of course yield different results,Footnote23 but we take heart from the convergence of our more traditional qualitative assessment of Albanian’s closest relative and the computational quantitative assessment by Chang et al.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books...60E32DA7362DD9
Se figur 13.1 där man placerar albanska i paleo-balkan gruppen. Cambridge University rankas som nr. 3 i världen bland universiteter. Jag litar mer på de än på en patetisk horunge som ägnar hela sin tid åt att ljuga.
Citat:
Due to the processes of Hellenization, Romanization and Slavicization in the region, the only modern descendants of Paleo-Balkan languages are Modern Greek—which is descended from Ancient Greek—and Albanian—which evolved from either Illyrian, Thracian, Dacian or another related tongue.[1][2][3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Balkan_languages
Även i denna källa refererar man till samma figur (13.1) som i Cambridge källan.