Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
NurseRatched
OK. Så du menar att man utvecklar beständiga T-celler efter genomliden infektion?
You really must have problems with your memory. Our argument was regarding whether or not people were developing T-Cell responses without measurable antibodies. You bought into the whole “the pandemic is over!” bullshit, and were saying that due to T-Cell immunity unmeasured in the population we had reached herd immunity, because you believed the theory from Karolinska stating that this “unmeasured T-Cell immunity” was 3x or more the known antibody prevalence.
I said “that’s fucking dumb, this isn’t over”. Then I pointed out that antibodies begin to wane in serum around three months after infection, and all their points relied on cases found in infected households over three months after infection. Meaning that antibodies had been produced and simply waned in serum, leaving only behind a measurable T-Cell response, but meaning that the initial infection would have been measurable.
Nowhere did I claim that a T-Cell response was not involved in providing immunity to the virus. Although, considering there are plenty of non-anecdotal reports of reinfection, the T-Cell immunity seems to last for under a year. That doesn’t matter, because we never argued that. You argued the pandemic was over, and I mean; it was summer. Cases were down, FHM was doing victory laps. I said it wasn’t over.
Since you do this every fucking month or so, do you remember now? I don’t understand why you’d want to bring up an argument, multiple times, that you’ve well and truly lost ... just to argue over a point I never made? It’s getting bizarre.