Svara inte på detta inlägg för ni får ändå inte svar. Nu är det färdigflashbackat för gott.
1. I staten Pennsylvania har den lagstiftande församlingen beslutat att Guvernören får utnämna elektorer enbart baserat på valresultatet. Om valresultatet överklagas är det en specifik domstol i Pennsylvania som avgör frågan och därefter kan saken överklagas hela vägen till SCOTUS.
2. Den lagstiftande församlingen kan ändra den beslutsordningen, huruvida Guvernörens veto eller 2/3-delars regeln är konstitutionell vid exempelvis ond tro är en annan fråga som kan prövas hela vägen till SCOTUS liksom exempelvis frågor om retroaktiv lagstiftning, återtagande av ändrad certifiering, etc. osv.
1. Det enda du bevisat med ditt inlägg är att jag har rätt!, Supremacy clause, free and fair elections och allt det där.
Slutligen svara inte på det här inlägget för ni får ändå inte svar, nu är det färdigflashbackat.
Citat:
Självklart är det så att guvernören i fallet PA (liksom i en hel del andra delstater) är den instans som har rätten, dvs det lagliga uppdraget, att utnämna elektorer för delstatens räkning. Han/hon gör alltså detta utifrån delstatens resultat i presidentvalet. Detta under delstatens lagar. Vi kan lugnt utgå från att det finns en sådan lag och att den har stiftats av PA:s senat och representanthus, avsikten var naturligtvis just att undvika taktiskt fulspel och försök att sno åt sig elektorsrösterna i samma legislatur.
1. I staten Pennsylvania har den lagstiftande församlingen beslutat att Guvernören får utnämna elektorer enbart baserat på valresultatet. Om valresultatet överklagas är det en specifik domstol i Pennsylvania som avgör frågan och därefter kan saken överklagas hela vägen till SCOTUS.
2. Den lagstiftande församlingen kan ändra den beslutsordningen, huruvida Guvernörens veto eller 2/3-delars regeln är konstitutionell vid exempelvis ond tro är en annan fråga som kan prövas hela vägen till SCOTUS liksom exempelvis frågor om retroaktiv lagstiftning, återtagande av ändrad certifiering, etc. osv.
Citat:
”On matters of state law, the judgment of a state supreme court is considered final and binding in both state and federal courts. ... Although state supreme court rulings on matters of state law are final, rulings on matters of federal law can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_supreme_court
” The Court's Jurisdiction
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).”
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about
According to the Constitution (Art. III, §2): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;-between a State and Citizens of another State;-between Citizens of different States;-between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
Appellate jurisdiction has been conferred upon the Supreme Court by various statutes, under the authority given Congress by the Constitution. The basic statute effective at this time in conferring and controlling jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be found in 28 U. S. C. §1251 et seq., and various special statutes.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/courtatwork.aspx
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_supreme_court
” The Court's Jurisdiction
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).”
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about
According to the Constitution (Art. III, §2): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;-between a State and Citizens of another State;-between Citizens of different States;-between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
Appellate jurisdiction has been conferred upon the Supreme Court by various statutes, under the authority given Congress by the Constitution. The basic statute effective at this time in conferring and controlling jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be found in 28 U. S. C. §1251 et seq., and various special statutes.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/courtatwork.aspx
1. Det enda du bevisat med ditt inlägg är att jag har rätt!, Supremacy clause, free and fair elections och allt det där.
Slutligen svara inte på det här inlägget för ni får ändå inte svar, nu är det färdigflashbackat.
