Anonym användare "Q" /pol/ hintar om massiv Deep State-upprensning i USA #TheStorm

Important moment in time.
The picture will be the signifier.
The signifier will 'force' the Q.
The Q will be answered (((WWG1WGA))).
Q

Jeffrey Epstein has been denied bail while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial in New York.

“The government has established danger to others and to the community by clear and convincing evidence,” Manhattan federal court Judge Richard Berman said on Thursday. “I doubt that any bail package can overcome a danger to the community.”

Rebuttable Presumption
The accused, however, may have to overcome the statutory rebuttable presumption of flight or dangerousness to secure his release on personal recognizance or an unsecured appearance bond.

A rebuttable presumption attaches under either of two circumstances. The first occurs when,
following a hearing, the judge finds probable cause to believe that the accused has committed one
of the serious crimes classified as either
 a 10-year drug offense;
 an offense involving possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence
or serious drug offense;
 a 10-year federal crime of terrorism;
a 20-year human trafficking offense;
or
 a designated sex offense committed against a child.

The second set of circumstances giving rise to a rebuttable presumption occurs when, following a hearing, the judge finds probable cause to believe that the accused previously committed a qualifying offense, much like those just described, while on bail, and for which he was convicted or released from imprisonment within the last five years.

Likely within days, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will release almost 2,000 pages of documents that could reveal sexual abuse by “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders,” according to the three-judge panel's ruling.

The documents were filed during a civil defamation lawsuit brought by Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a former Mar-a-Lago locker-room attendant, against Epstein’s former girlfriend and alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. “Nobody who was around Epstein a lot is going to have an easy time now. It’s all going to come out,” said Giuffre’s lawyer David Boies. Another person involved with litigation against Epstein told me: “It’s going to be staggering, the amount of names. It’s going to be contagion numbers.”

But it is unclear if prosecutors plan to file additional charges in the case, which led to the conviction of Michael D. Cohen, the president’s former lawyer.

A federal judge in Manhattan disclosed on Wednesday that prosecutors have concluded their investigation into campaign finance violations involving President Trump and ordered that they publicly release some of their files, a new twist in a case that had threatened to upend the Trump presidency.

In ordering the unsealing of search warrants and related documents in connection with a 2018 raid on Mr. Cohen’s home and office, the judge, William H. Pauley III, said the campaign finance violations discussed in the papers “are a matter of national importance.”

“Now that the government’s investigation into those violations has concluded,” Judge Pauley wrote, “it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the materials.”

The material is expected to be released Thursday morning.

An original set of nearly 900 pages of search warrants and other records that contained extensive redactions was ordered released by the judge in March in response to a request by The New York Times and other news organizations. Judge Pauley ordered prosecutors to provide him with the confidential status report by this week.

Judge Pauley is still allowing the prosecutors to black out some portions, which he called “limited references” to an “uncharged third-party.” The identity of that person is unclear.

Likely within days, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will release almost 2,000 pages of documents that could reveal sexual abuse by “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders,” according to the three-judge panel's ruling.

The documents were filed during a civil defamation lawsuit brought by Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a former Mar-a-Lago locker-room attendant, against Epstein’s former girlfriend and alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. “Nobody who was around Epstein a lot is going to have an easy time now. It’s all going to come out,” said Giuffre’s lawyer David Boies. Another person involved with litigation against Epstein told me: “It’s going to be staggering, the amount of names. It’s going to be contagion numbers.”

But it is unclear if prosecutors plan to file additional charges in the case, which led to the conviction of Michael D. Cohen, the president’s former lawyer.

A federal judge in Manhattan disclosed on Wednesday that prosecutors have concluded their investigation into campaign finance violations involving President Trump and ordered that they publicly release some of their files, a new twist in a case that had threatened to upend the Trump presidency.

In ordering the unsealing of search warrants and related documents in connection with a 2018 raid on Mr. Cohen’s home and office, the judge, William H. Pauley III, said the campaign finance violations discussed in the papers “are a matter of national importance.”

“Now that the government’s investigation into those violations has concluded,” Judge Pauley wrote, “it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the materials.”

The material is expected to be released Thursday morning.

An original set of nearly 900 pages of search warrants and other records that contained extensive redactions was ordered released by the judge in March in response to a request by The New York Times and other news organizations. Judge Pauley ordered prosecutors to provide him with the confidential status report by this week.

Judge Pauley is still allowing the prosecutors to black out some portions, which he called “limited references” to an “uncharged third-party.” The identity of that person is unclear.