Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
trngw
Quite the contrary, bleeding to death is the one and only cause I have been able to find that would not show up in any specific, provable, way of being the death cause.
Ýou can bleed alot, without dying, you can get stabs like KW, witout dying. So those things alone are not enough to say someone died, if you get treatment. However, in the lack of any other evidence of cause of death, I believe the conclusion can be no other - the stabbings causing bleeding led to her death. We know it would if it was not treated and nothing else caused her death before she bled to death. So in my opinion it is a very plausible cause, and a highly likely.
Are you sure one cannot find out "bleeding to death" in the autopsy? I am not a doctor but found the following in a presentation of a lecture named "Scharfe Gewalt und Identifizierung" = "Sharp violence and identification" on the home page of the german University of Rostock.
They give clear diagnostics for bleeding to death. So if the remains were in such a good state as you mentioned, shouldn't this be determined?
https://rechtsmedizin.med.uni-rostock.de/fileadmin/Institute/rechtsmedizin/Vorlesung_Downloads/6._Scharfe_Gewalt_Ident_Port_2015-2016.pdf page 57
Diagnoseweisend beim (todesursächlichen) Verbluten:
Reduzierte Totenflecken
Blässe innerer Organe
subendokardiale Blutungen = Entblutungsblutungen
entspeicherte Milz
Schockzeichnung der Nieren (blasse Rinde, hyperämische Markkegel)
-> Diagnose "Verbluten" beim Vorhandensein eines oder mehrerer Kriterien
(My) Translation:
Diagnosing the (deadly) bleeding:
Reduced lividity
Paleness of inner organs
subendocardial bleedings = debleeding bleedings
spilled spleen
Shock drawing of the kidneys (pale bark, hyperemic medullary cones)
-> Diagnosis of "bleeding to death" in the presence of one or more criteria