Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Slottsherre
Ja, det enda vettiga vore ju sjukvård till alla, och att det finansierades via skatten, precis som i de flesta civiliserade länder. Men det ser ju de flesta amerikaner (även många demokrater) som ren kommunism.
Det är därför Obamacare är en så halvdan och illa fungerande kompromiss.
Absolut, men AHCA kommer också att påverka folk som har försäkring genom jobbet:
Citat:
Far less attention has been paid to the effect on people with employer-sponsored insurance.
Trump pledged not to cut Medicaid. Is he keeping that promise?
If even a few states let insurers offer inexpensive plans that cover only bare-bones benefits, large nationwide employers could set up their coverage along those lines. Such plans would come with lower premiums, but could leave people with huge gaps in their coverage, according to Matthew Fiedler, a health policy analyst at the Brookings Institution who wrote a recent article about the change.
What’s more, other Affordable Care Act protections — notably, the cap on how much patients spend out of pocket each year — are tied to essential benefits. The ban on insurers imposing lifetime limits on coverage is also tied to essential benefits.
If states let insurers pare those benefits way back, those protections are essentially toothless. People on a plan that doesn’t cover hospitalization, for instance, will have no cap at all on their out-of-pocket costs for hospital bills.
Fiedler said that could leave many Americans vulnerable to catastrophic bills in a health crisis.
“At a bare minimum, I think you’re going to see a whole bunch of coverage categories get carved out,” Fiedler said. “You really only need one state with no essential benefit standards for large employers nationwide” to begin deploying much skimpier plans.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/little-noted-provision-of-gop-health-bill-could-alter-employer-plans-1493890203
Arbetsgivare kommer försöka sänka sina kostnader och också hamna på mindre bra planer i många fall.