Det är ett jävla tjat om att folk inte vågar erkänna att de kommer rösta på Donald i dessa trådar, att hans stöd egentligen är mycket större bland någon sorts "silent majority", så varför tar vi inte och tittar på vilken relevans detta påstående har i verkligheten (jag vet, ett helt främmande koncept här numera)? 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/20/1582375/-Todd-Akin-shows-how-it-could-get-much-worse-for-Trump-and-cost-Republicans-control-of-Congress
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/20/1582375/-Todd-Akin-shows-how-it-could-get-much-worse-for-Trump-and-cost-Republicans-control-of-Congress
Citat:
As a result, many pundits immediately presumed Akin had rendered himself dead man walking, but—and this is the crucial point—the polls simply didn’t show it. Two weeks after “legitimate rape,” Akin only trailed McCaskill by 1 percent, according to the Pollster average. Even a full month later, he was behind just 3.3 percent, and on Election Day—two and a half months after his meltdown—polls “only” showed her 8.7 points ahead. You can see it all unfold in the chart below
Yet McCaskill ultimately prevailed in a 15.7 point landslide, which few polls came close to predicting. Akin’s example could matter greatly for Trump, since polls taken even two weeks after his implosion similarly have not shown a sharp swing toward Clinton yet. But as Akin shows, they soon could.
Presidential elections are more polarized than downballot ones, and many of the so-called “game changers” of past races don’t actually swing many votes. However, unlike in practically every modern election, Trump’s party leaders and elites will no longer be there to defend him from every attack and prime Republican-leaning voters to circle the wagons around him. This unprecedented situation makes it plausible that Trump’s numbers could decline further under sustained scrutiny. Even more critically, droves of Republicans might simply not vote because they are demoralized by the prospect of an unwinnable race.
Yet McCaskill ultimately prevailed in a 15.7 point landslide, which few polls came close to predicting. Akin’s example could matter greatly for Trump, since polls taken even two weeks after his implosion similarly have not shown a sharp swing toward Clinton yet. But as Akin shows, they soon could.
Presidential elections are more polarized than downballot ones, and many of the so-called “game changers” of past races don’t actually swing many votes. However, unlike in practically every modern election, Trump’s party leaders and elites will no longer be there to defend him from every attack and prime Republican-leaning voters to circle the wagons around him. This unprecedented situation makes it plausible that Trump’s numbers could decline further under sustained scrutiny. Even more critically, droves of Republicans might simply not vote because they are demoralized by the prospect of an unwinnable race.
__________________
Senast redigerad av zergrush 2016-10-22 kl. 02:09.
Senast redigerad av zergrush 2016-10-22 kl. 02:09.
? vita huset kunde inte ens bekräfta om det var ryssarna så
och ta dina foliehatts konspirationsteorier någon annanstans. 
