Citat:
SMHI.
http://www.smhi.se/nyhetsarkiv/arets-ozonhal-over-antarktis-redan-over-1.33533
Här är länken till uppgifterna om 2014:
http://www.theozonehole.com/2014ozonehole.htm
Jag känner inte till denne Wigington. Är det någon man borde känna till? Bidrar han möjligen till albedo-värdet genom att ha folie som huvudbonad?
Fick upp denna debunksida när jag sökte på hans namn.
Sammanfattning: 1. He claims that the increase in UV is due to a decrease in ozone from "spraying", but rather than measure Total Column Ozone and showing a decrease, he is only displaying some measurements of UV.
2. As usual, we get no information on who actually took the measurements, what sort of instrument was used and whether or not it was calibrated or operated properly.
3. Some clue about the instrument and calibration might be found in this comment:
"The metering performed in Northern California, on which this statement is based, was done by a pair of identical state-of-the-art, brand-new, science-grade meters guaranteed to be scientifically calibrated to a range within 4%. As stated earlier in this article, the tech who did this metering is a 40- year veteran in environmental measurement and interpretation."
This could be Francis Mangels, who has previously been found to make bogus claims.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-dane-wigingtons-claims-that-uv-is-off-the-charts.2097/
Ok nu kommer ingen någonsin ta dig på allvar igen. Ännu en bot avslöjad.
