Jag skulle uppskatta om de som stödjer Putins aggression kunde berätta vad Ukraina bör göra för att rädda ekonomin. Jag har förstått att de som inte tycker att Ryssland gjort något fel i konflikten anser att kontakter med IMF och EU är det absolut värsta Ukrainas kommande regering kan ägna sig åt.
Jag har själv inga höga tankar om IMF och EU, jag skulle kunna skriva ilskna haranger sida upp och sida ner här i tråden och förklara varför de organisationerna historiskt sett och i samtiden är något man bör vara väldigt vaksam inför. Men det är inte topic, jag har inte tid och ork.
Men jag är uppriktigt nyfiken på hur de som säger "Ukraina ska absolut inte ha någon kontakt med IMF och EU" skulle hantera situationen varje ukrainsk regering kommer att ställas inför. Inbillar ni er att om man lånar pengar av ryssen/juden i Ryssland eller kinesen i Kina eller araben i Saudiarabien eller japanen i Japan så behöver man inte betala någon ränta, och kapitalet ges utan förpliktelser? Vad skulle ni, som tycks så övertygade om att ni vet allt och kan allt och har den överlägset bästa lösningen för Ukraina, för att inte säga världen, göra?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/world/europe/ukraines-fight-to-fix-economy-is-also-a-fight-for-legitimacy.html
Citat:
Young men in fatigues, bulletproof vests and masks patrol one of Kiev’s better hotels, the Dnipro, and they have occupied several floors. Armed with clubs, pistols and even slingshots, they are the militant Ukrainian nationalists of Pravy Sektor, or Right Sector.
On schedule, they march out to the streets, to the encampment known as the Maidan, or Independence Square, where the bloody battle for Kiev was fought. To many they are heroes, but they are an intimidating presence. And their leader, Dmytro Yarosh — who is also the new deputy secretary of the National Security and Defense Council — has political ambitions, announcing on Friday that he will run for president in May.---
Pavlo Sheremeta, Ukraine’s new minister of economy, said the urgent priority for the new government was cash in the banks. Hard currency reserves are estimated to be only about $12 billion, even with controls on the withdrawal of capital, and large debts are coming due.
The central bank is printing cash for now, as the value of the currency drops, and a team of economists from the International Monetary Fund should be able to come up with a better analysis of the country’s needs next week, Mr. Sheremeta said.
The second priority, he said, is “safety and security in the streets” to try to restore business confidence and attract new investment. “It’s hard to have business activity when you feel insecure,” he said. Crimea, in particular, is about to lose its tourist season. “Events in Crimea worry us in terms of the integrity of the country, but worry us even more in terms of tourist potential,” Mr. Sheremeta said.---
The struggle to right the economy is as much a struggle for sovereignty as the crisis in Crimea. A weak Ukraine is fated to be dominated by outsiders — Moscow wants to ensure those outsiders are Russian, not European or American.
“Stated simply, Ukraine is the economic equivalent of a failed state,” said Robert J. Shapiro, co-founder and chairman of Sonecon, a private firm that advises American and foreign businesses, in a post for The Globalist, an online magazine. Ukraine’s credit rating is worse than Greece’s and large debts will soon come due, with some $15 billion in sovereign bonds maturing this year and another $15 billion in 2015. With a current account deficit equal to 8 percent of its gross domestic product, Ukraine cannot pay off and refinance those debts without large-scale aid — some $35 billion over two years, the new government says.
Ukraine’s vulnerabilities are enormous, partly a result of 23 years of mismanagement since independence from the Soviet Union, when early reforms were quickly jettisoned and the economy was distorted by corruption, favoritism, patronage and outright theft.