Citat:
Ja du har rätt. Men det blev olagligt för helt fel anledningar. Detta är till stor del tack vare Henry Anslinger. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_J._Anslinger
Och såklart "Reefer madness"
http://www.marijuanaplanet.us/reefer_madness3.jpg
Some of his critics[who?] allege that Anslinger and the campaign against marijuana had a hidden agenda, DuPont petrochemical interests and William Randolph Hearst together created the highly sensational anti-marijuana campaign to eliminate hemp as an industrial competitor. Indeed, Anslinger did not himself consider marijuana a serious threat to American society until in the fourth year of his tenure (1934), at which point an anti-marijuana campaign, aimed at alarming the public, became his primary focus as part of the government's broader push to outlaw all recreational drugs.[12] Members of the League of Nations had already implemented restrictions for marijuana in the beginning of the 1930s and restrictions started in many states in the U.S years before Anslinger was appointed. Both president Franklin D. Roosevelt and his attorney general publicly supported this development in 1935.[12][13]
By using the mass media as his forum (receiving much support from William Randolph Hearst), Anslinger propelled the anti-marijuana sentiment from the state level to a national movement. Writing for The American Magazine, the best examples were contained in his "Gore File", a collection of quotes from police reports, by later opponents described as police-blotter-type narratives of heinous cases, most with no substantiation, linking graphically depicted offenses with the drug. Anslinger sometimes used the very brief and concise language in many police reports when he wrote about drug crimes:
"An entire family was murdered by a youthful addict in Florida. When officers arrived at the home, they found the youth staggering about in a human slaughterhouse. With an axe he had killed his father, mother, two brothers, and a sister. He seemed to be in a daze… He had no recollection of having committed the multiple crime. The officers knew him ordinarily as a sane, rather quiet young man; now he was pitifully crazed. They sought the reason. The boy said that he had been in the habit of smoking something which youthful friends called “muggles,” a childish name for marijuana."[14]
Anslinger has been accused[by whom?] to be responsible for racial themes in articles against marijuana in the 1930s.
“By the tons it is coming into this country — the deadly, dreadful poison that racks and tears not only the body, but the very heart and soul of every human being who once becomes a slave to it in any of its cruel and devastating forms…. Marihuana is a short cut to the insane asylum. Smoke marihuana cigarettes for a month and what was once your brain will be nothing but a storehouse of horrid specters. Hasheesh makes a murderer who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him….”[15]
"Colored students at the Univ. of Minn. partying with (white) female students, smoking [marijuana] and getting their sympathy with stories of racial persecution. Result: pregnancy"[16][17]
"Two Negros took a girl fourteen years old and kept her for two days under the influence of hemp. Upon recovery she was found to be suffering from syphilis."[17][18]
"The first Federal law-enforcement administrator to recognize the signs of a national criminal syndication and sound the alarm was Harry J. Anslinger, Commissioner of the Bureau of Narcotics in the Treasury" (Ronald Reagan 1986)[19]
When Anslinger was interviewed in 1954 about drug abuse (see below), he did not mention anything about race or sex. In his book The Protectors (1964) Anslinger has a chapter called "Jazz and Junk Don't Mix" about the black jazz musicians Billie Holiday and Charlie Parker, who both died after years of heroin and alcohol abuse:
"Jazz entertainers are neither fish nor fowl. They do not get the million-dollar protection Hollywood and Broadway can afford for their stars who have become addicted – and there are many more than will ever be revealed. Perhaps this is because jazz, once considered a decadent kind of music, has only token respectability. Jazz grew up next door to crime, so to speak. Clubs of dubious reputation were, for a long time, the only places where it could be heard. But the times bring changes, and as Billy Holiday was a victim of time and change, so too was Charlie Parker, a man whose music, like Billie's, is still widely imitated. Most musicians credit Parker among others as spearheading what is called modern jazz." (p. 157)
Anslinger hoped to orchestrate a nationwide dragnet of jazz musicians and kept a file called 'Marijuana and Musicians'.[20]
By using the mass media as his forum (receiving much support from William Randolph Hearst), Anslinger propelled the anti-marijuana sentiment from the state level to a national movement. Writing for The American Magazine, the best examples were contained in his "Gore File", a collection of quotes from police reports, by later opponents described as police-blotter-type narratives of heinous cases, most with no substantiation, linking graphically depicted offenses with the drug. Anslinger sometimes used the very brief and concise language in many police reports when he wrote about drug crimes:
"An entire family was murdered by a youthful addict in Florida. When officers arrived at the home, they found the youth staggering about in a human slaughterhouse. With an axe he had killed his father, mother, two brothers, and a sister. He seemed to be in a daze… He had no recollection of having committed the multiple crime. The officers knew him ordinarily as a sane, rather quiet young man; now he was pitifully crazed. They sought the reason. The boy said that he had been in the habit of smoking something which youthful friends called “muggles,” a childish name for marijuana."[14]
Anslinger has been accused[by whom?] to be responsible for racial themes in articles against marijuana in the 1930s.
“By the tons it is coming into this country — the deadly, dreadful poison that racks and tears not only the body, but the very heart and soul of every human being who once becomes a slave to it in any of its cruel and devastating forms…. Marihuana is a short cut to the insane asylum. Smoke marihuana cigarettes for a month and what was once your brain will be nothing but a storehouse of horrid specters. Hasheesh makes a murderer who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him….”[15]
"Colored students at the Univ. of Minn. partying with (white) female students, smoking [marijuana] and getting their sympathy with stories of racial persecution. Result: pregnancy"[16][17]
"Two Negros took a girl fourteen years old and kept her for two days under the influence of hemp. Upon recovery she was found to be suffering from syphilis."[17][18]
"The first Federal law-enforcement administrator to recognize the signs of a national criminal syndication and sound the alarm was Harry J. Anslinger, Commissioner of the Bureau of Narcotics in the Treasury" (Ronald Reagan 1986)[19]
When Anslinger was interviewed in 1954 about drug abuse (see below), he did not mention anything about race or sex. In his book The Protectors (1964) Anslinger has a chapter called "Jazz and Junk Don't Mix" about the black jazz musicians Billie Holiday and Charlie Parker, who both died after years of heroin and alcohol abuse:
"Jazz entertainers are neither fish nor fowl. They do not get the million-dollar protection Hollywood and Broadway can afford for their stars who have become addicted – and there are many more than will ever be revealed. Perhaps this is because jazz, once considered a decadent kind of music, has only token respectability. Jazz grew up next door to crime, so to speak. Clubs of dubious reputation were, for a long time, the only places where it could be heard. But the times bring changes, and as Billy Holiday was a victim of time and change, so too was Charlie Parker, a man whose music, like Billie's, is still widely imitated. Most musicians credit Parker among others as spearheading what is called modern jazz." (p. 157)
Anslinger hoped to orchestrate a nationwide dragnet of jazz musicians and kept a file called 'Marijuana and Musicians'.[20]
Och såklart "Reefer madness"
http://www.marijuanaplanet.us/reefer_madness3.jpg
Så ja, nu så har vi korrekt fakta.
Citat:
Nej, jag vill inte att staten ska bli knarklangare och tjäna pengar på eländet. Jag vill att det ska bekämpas. Detta på samma sätt som man gör i många andra länder. Mexiko, USA, Iran, Ryssland, Thailand ex.vis. Föredömen på många sätt.
Görs knark lagligt så blir det vanligare. Tillgången kommer att öka. Ökad tillgång leder ofelbart till en ökad försäljning och följdaktligen också ökat knarkande. Ju fler som börjar med "lätt" knark, desto fler övergår också till "tyngre". Därför så anser jag att allt knark ska bekämpas hårt. Dessutom så är ert "lätta" knark bara en början. En inkörsport. Görs ett knark lagligt så vad är nästa steg? Gissa. Inte underligt att det ofta är de stora som tjänar pengar på knarket som också är de som allra mest vill göra det lagligt.
Ta gärna del av f.d. knarkares berättelser. Det finns många sådana att läsa på nätet. Gemensamt för dem är att de inte vill göra ens "lätt" knark lagligt. De om några borde veta. De är vanligtvis mycket negativa till även "lätt" knark och vill absolut inte att skräpet ska göras lagligt. De talar ofta om det som en inkörsport de också.
Görs knark lagligt så blir det vanligare. Tillgången kommer att öka. Ökad tillgång leder ofelbart till en ökad försäljning och följdaktligen också ökat knarkande. Ju fler som börjar med "lätt" knark, desto fler övergår också till "tyngre". Därför så anser jag att allt knark ska bekämpas hårt. Dessutom så är ert "lätta" knark bara en början. En inkörsport. Görs ett knark lagligt så vad är nästa steg? Gissa. Inte underligt att det ofta är de stora som tjänar pengar på knarket som också är de som allra mest vill göra det lagligt.
Ta gärna del av f.d. knarkares berättelser. Det finns många sådana att läsa på nätet. Gemensamt för dem är att de inte vill göra ens "lätt" knark lagligt. De om några borde veta. De är vanligtvis mycket negativa till även "lätt" knark och vill absolut inte att skräpet ska göras lagligt. De talar ofta om det som en inkörsport de också.
Fast att cannabis är en inkörsport är inte en hållbar teori längre, den är överbevisad. Så bara för du säger att fler kommer ta tyngre droger är det inte en objektiv sanning. Att cannabis görs legalt gör att fler brukar och testar cannabis ja, men således i relation till hur många som dricker alkohol. Det erbjuds ett alternativ. Inte 10. Inte heroin, amfetamin eller vad du nu vill. Det erbjuds ett alternativ. Ett alternativ som kan lätta på skattetrycket, potentiellt minska bruket av alkohol och således även problematik kring alkohol.
Ja klart att f.d narkomaner vill ha droger legalt, dess nuvarande status inkräktar på deras vilja att ta en drog. De som säljer droger vill inte ha det legalt. Förstår du hur mycket pengar de skulle förlora på det?
Mexiko håller redan på att överväga att legalisera p.g.a de anser att de förlorat kriget mot droger. Sen USA, really? De har ju precis legaliserat i 2 stater. Visserligen inte på federal nivå, men ändå. Sen Iran. Ja. De verkar ha högst andel missbrukare i världen. Visst verkar de gå bra med alla krig mot droger som förs? http://news.msn.com/world/iran-drug-addiction-rate-highest-in-world
Grejen är att jag är med på exakt vad du menar. Du vill moralisera kring det samt reducera potentiella skador på samhället - de du tidigare nämnt- men grejen är att allt du nämnt skadas redan enormt p.g.a kriget mot droger.
__________________
Senast redigerad av Brmc 2014-01-08 kl. 23:37.
Senast redigerad av Brmc 2014-01-08 kl. 23:37.

.