• 1
  • 2
2009-08-28, 11:41
  #1
Medlem
InOurNatures avatar
En fre detta FBI tolk Sibel Edmonds talar ut om vad hon vet under hennes ett riga tid p FBI. Det r vldigt mnga klipp samt mycket information. Har full frstelse fr att man inte orkar kolla igenom. Dock r det vl vrt d mycket av informationen r skrmmande.

Hur som, lng historia kort. Sibel Edmonds med flertalet "degrees" i allt frn Psykologi till Biologi anstlls som tolk t FBI (Talar flertalet sprk flytande, dribland Turkiska) 14 september 2001. Detta har naturligtvis att gra med 9/11 och det kade behovet av Turkiska tolkar. Hennes kontrakt sgs upp av FBI knappt ett r senare. Sedan dess har hon blivit ner tystad. Fram tills nu.

Fr det frsta och kanske mest intressanta sger hon att FBI inte stoppade 9/11 frn att hnda fr att den Arabiska versttnings enheten inom FBI medvetet frsenade utredningar som behvde klaras upp fr att man skulle kunna agera.

Ls den meningen en gng till och lt den sjukna in.

Detta r bara brjan, ls grna artiklarna och se videon. Detta r _stort_, detta r mer eller mindre en bekrftelse p att alla dessa hel vilda och dumma konspirations teorier inte riktigt r teorier. Snarare r det vad som sker i praktiken.

Vad tycker ni om detta? Ni som vljer att se videon eller lsa artiklarna lmna grna er redogrelse fr vad ni tycker.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_wLy...e=channel_page

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7374

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general...s20050126.html

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/08/...onds-testimony

http://www.justacitizen.com/
__________________
Senast redigerad av InOurNature 2009-08-28 kl. 11:43.
Citera
2009-08-28, 13:43
  #2
Medlem
Evil_Santas avatar
I call BS.
Citera
2009-08-28, 13:51
  #3
Medlem
InOurNatures avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Evil_Santa
I call BS.

P vilket stt? Att allt det hon sger r en lgn eller vad?
Citera
2009-08-28, 14:45
  #4
Medlem
Niklas_1980s avatar
P vilket stt har hon inte kunnat bertta detta tidigare?
Citera
2009-08-28, 15:17
  #5
Medlem
jonts avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av InOurNature
text
Fan vad intressant , nr jag fr tid ska jag kolla igenom det nogrannare.
Citera
2009-08-28, 15:26
  #6
Moderator
blomvattnares avatar
Den som har skrivklda kan grna skriva en sammanfattning p svenska!
Citera
2009-08-28, 18:04
  #7
Medlem
xploddans avatar
Lter antingen helt BS eller bitter ex-anstlld som r i behov av lite uppmrksamhet...
Citera
2009-08-28, 18:10
  #8
Medlem
Funderarmusens avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av blomvattnare
Den som har skrivklda kan grna skriva en sammanfattning p svenska!


Citera
2009-08-28, 19:10
  #9
Medlem
InOurNatures avatar
Frn: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general...s20050126.html

SEPT. 11, 2001: Terrorists attack the U.S., killing 3,000 in New York, Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania.

FALL 2001: Sibel Edmonds is hired by the FBI as a contract translator.

FALL 2001 - MARCH 2002: Edmonds discovers and reports several problems inside the FBI, including shoddy translation work, a large backlog of untranslated documents and employees with questionable alliances.

MARCH 2002: Edmonds is fired from the FBI.

JUNE 2002: The FBI acknowledges the truth of some of Edmonds' allegations.

JUNE 2002: Senators Grassley and Leahy write the Justice Department Inspector General a letter asking specific questions about Edmonds' allegations and write that the FBI has confirmed many of her allegations in unclassified briefings. This letter is later retroactively classified in May 2004.

JULY 2002: Edmonds files a lawsuit to challenge the FBI's retaliatory actions.

AUGUST 2002: Senator Leahy writes Attorney General John Ashcroft a letter asking for a speedy and thorough investigation of Edmonds' case. This letter is later retroactively classified in May 2004. The investigation is not completed for another two years, and then is classified.

FEBRUARY 2004: Edmonds testifies to the 9-11 Commission about problems at the FBI.

MAY 2004: The Justice Department retroactively classifies Edmonds' briefings to Senators Grassley and Leahy in 2002, as well as FBI briefings regarding her allegations.

JUNE 2004: The Project On Government Oversight files suit against the Justice Department and Attorney General Ashcroft, saying the retroactive classification violates the organization's First Amendment rights.

JULY 2004: A Justice Department investigation into Edmonds' dismissal is completed but is entirely classified. The report finds that Edmonds' allegations of corruption within the FBI ""were at least a contributing factor" in her dismissal.

JULY 2004: Judge Reggie Walton in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismisses Edmonds' lawsuit, relying on the government's states secrets privilege.

Return to main Whistleblower page.
JANUARY 2005: ACLU files brief urging the D.C. Court of Appeals to reinstate the Edmonds' case, saying that the government is abusing the ""state secrets privilege"" to silence employees who expose national security blunders. Oral argument is scheduled for April 21, 2005.

JANUARY 2005: The Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General releases an unclassified summary of its investigation into Edmonds' termination. The report concludes that Edmonds was fired for reporting serious security breaches and misconduct in the agency's translation program, and that many of her allegations were supported.
Citera
2009-08-28, 19:16
  #10
Medlem
InOurNatures avatar
Liten sammanfattning p engelska:

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sibel...eneath-surface
Citera
2009-08-29, 19:19
  #11
Medlem
Vidovdans avatar
Det hr verkar onekligen intressant. Jag ska stta mig ett par timmar i lugn och ro imorgon och titta igenom det.
Citera
2009-08-29, 19:24
  #12
Medlem
Balthazaer-s avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av InOurNature
FALL 2001 - MARCH 2002: Edmonds discovers and reports several problems inside the FBI, including shoddy translation work, a large backlog of untranslated documents and employees with questionable alliances.

S, araberna som verstter t FBI r lata/motstrviga och kanske vill skydda sina gamla klanmedlemmar. P vilket stt skulle det ha ngonting med 9/11-konspirationerna att gra? Fr dom handlar vl snarare om att det INTE var araberna som var orsaken...?
Citera
  • 1
  • 2

Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera

Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera

Skapa ett konto

Det är enkelt att registrera ett nytt konto

Bli medlem

Logga in

Har du redan ett konto? Logga in här

Logga in