Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av victor.b
Därför så kan man ju inte mer än anta att det är så, eller hur?
Tja, drar man det till sitt yttersta så kan man väl se det så. Det visar sig ju dock stämma gång på gång när det gäller "naturals". Anser du att det inte stämmer eller?
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Arne Persson
Runt 25? Var har du fått det ifrån?
Artikeln på träningslära som jag just länkade till.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7496846
Citat:
Clin J Sport Med. 1995 Oct;5(4):223-8.
Fat-free mass index in users and nonusers of anabolic-androgenic steroids.
Kouri EM, Pope HG Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P.
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts 02178, USA.
We calculated fat-free mass index (FFMI) in a sample of 157 male athletes, comprising 83 users of anabolic-androgenic steroids and 74 nonusers. FFMI is defined by the formula (fat-free body mass in kg) x (height in meters)-2. We then added a slight correction of 6.3 x (1.80 m - height) to normalize these values to the height of a 1.8-m man. The normalized FFMI values of athletes who had not used steroids extended up to a well-defined limit of 25.0. Similarly, a sample of 20 Mr. America winners from the presteroid era (1939-1959), for whom we estimated the normalized FFMI, had a mean FFMI of 25.4. By contrast, the FFMI of many of the steroid users in our sample easily exceeded 25.0, and that of some even exceeded 30. Thus, although these findings must be regarded as preliminary, it appears that FFMI may represent a useful initial measure to screen for possible steroid abuse, especially in athletic, medical, or forensic situations in which individuals may attempt to deny such behavior.
Nu åker jag bort, så jag kommer inte kunna svara på ett tag!